Laserfiche WebLink
Eugene’s power profile includes a nominal amount of high GHG emitting generation <br />sources; therefore there may be a slight rate increase over time for any purchases of coal <br />fired power. The City of Eugene should support HB 3064 and SB 101. <br />HB 3399 <br />Relating to vehicular homicide. <br />Relating Clause: <br /> Creates crime of vehicular homicide. Punishes by maximum of five years' imprisonment, <br />Title: <br />$125,000 fine, or both. <br /> Directs police officer responding to accident in which person is seriously injured or killed <br />to administer tests to operators of vehicles involved to determine if operators were under <br />influence of intoxicants. Makes results of tests admissible at trial for vehicular homicide. <br />Makes refusal of test admissible at any court proceeding or trial. <br /> Representative READ; Representatives BARKER, RILEY, Senators BONAMICI, HASS <br />Sponsored by: <br />(at the request of Mary ODonnell) <br />http://www.leg.state.or.us/09reg/measpdf/hb3300.dir/hb3399.intro.pdf <br />URL: <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />E. Cushman M. Gilbert EPD-ADM 4/13/2009 Pri 3 Yes YesV. C7 Neutral <br />Comments: <br />***Neutral as written; support if appropriately amended*** <br />We appreciate that this bill is attempting to improve the ability to hold those accountable <br />to violate traffic laws and kill or seriously injure others. However, we have concerns <br />about Section 3 of the bill as written. First, this section mandates a police officer <br />"administer tests" to every driver of a vehicle involved in a traffic crash which kills or <br />seriously injured someone to determine whether that driver was driving under the <br />influence of intoxicants. First, we have traditionally opposed laws that require, rather <br />than permit, officers to take specific actions. Second, the wording does not specify what <br />"tests" must be done. Unless this provision were made more specific, or supplemented <br />by administrative rule, it is not clear to police officers what is expected, let alone <br />members of the public. Third, we believe that this section will most likely be subject to <br />challenges based on whether or not it is constitutional. <br />We strongly support Section 2 of the bill, which creates a crime of vehicular homicide for <br />a situation in which a driver is involved in a traffic crash that kills someone and that driver <br />was driving while impaired, was driving without driving privileges, or was driving without <br />insurance. In any of those situations, if the driver had not been driving in violation of the <br />law, someone would still be alive. Therefore, we strongly support being able to hold such <br />individuals accountable. <br />We recommend that Section 3 be removed from the bill or be revised to address the <br />concerns we have expressed. If this is done, we would support the bill. <br />HB 2426A <br />Relating to penalties for driving while under the influence of intoxicants. <br />Relating Clause: <br /> Imposes minimum fine of $2,500 { - and mandatory imprisonment - } for person <br />Title: <br />convicted of driving while under influence of intoxicants if person had { - 0.20 - }{ + 0.15 <br />+ } percent or more by weight of alcohol in blood of person at time of offense. <br /> COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY <br />Sponsored by: <br />http://www.leg.state.or.us/09reg/measpdf/hb2400.dir/hb2426.a.pdf <br />URL: <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />E. Cushman M. Gilbert EPD-ADM 4/14/2009 Pri 3 Yes YesV. C7 Support <br />Comments: <br />5 <br />