Laserfiche WebLink
Relating Clause: Relating to qualification of resource land for inclusion in urban growth boundary. <br />Title: Modifies priority of lands considered for inclusion in urban growth boundary. <br />Sponsored by: COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY (at the request of Oregon State Bar Real Estate Section) <br />URL:http://www.leg.state.or.us/09reg/measpdf/sb0300.dir/sb0372.intro.pdf <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />Steve Nystrom PDD-ADM 1/26/2009 Pri 3 Yes IV. D5 Neutral <br />Comments: <br />Bill provides clarifying language to an existing statute. Does not result in any substantive <br />changes to requirements describing which lands to prioritize for consideration. <br />SB 0471 <br />Relating Clause: Relating to discriminatory practices. <br />Title: <br />Prohibits state or local government from discriminating against homeowner by imposing <br />permit requirement for certain rentals. <br /> Requires administrative law judges to make up membership of special tribunals or be <br />hearing officers at proceedings alleging certain unlawful or discriminatory practices. <br />Sponsored by: Senator ATKINSON (at the request of Bill Earl) <br />URL:http://www.leg.state.or.us/09reg/measpdf/sb0400.dir/sb0471.intro.pdf <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />Richie Weinman PDD-DEV 2/13/2009 <br />Comments: <br />I'll leave this to Human Rights staff <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />Andy Fernandez CS-CMO 2/19/2009 No No Neutral <br />Comments: <br />Doesn't seem to change the definition of discrimination or protected classes so no direct <br />impact on our services from a diversity or human rights perspective. It may reinforce the <br />City's position on anti-discrimination and human rights however. <br />SB 0476 <br />Relating Clause: Relating to electric company public purpose charges; appropriating money. <br />Title: <br />Changes distribution of amounts collected as public purpose charge by electric <br />companies and Oregon Community Power. Limits amount allocated annually for new <br />cost-effective conservation and new market transformation. <br /> Creates programs for distribution of moneys for energy conservation measures to <br />schools, cities and counties in areas where public purpose charge is collected, with <br />money diverted from new cost-effective conservation and new market transformation <br />purposes. <br /> Establishes School Energy Conservation Fund, City Energy Conservation Fund and <br />County Energy Conservation Fund. <br />Continuously appropriates moneys in each fund to State Department of Energy for <br />distribution to school districts, cities and counties for respective energy conservation <br />measures. <br />Sponsored by: Senators GEORGE, JOHNSON <br />URL:http://www.leg.state.or.us/09reg/measpdf/sb0400.dir/sb0476.intro.pdf <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />Ethan Nelson PDD-BPS 2/17/2009 Pri 2 Yes YesII. B1 Neutral <br />Comments: <br />SB 476 would provide annual funding to Oregon cities for energy efficiency programs. It <br />is unclear at this point if Eugene would be eligible for the program. The program is <br />financed from public purpose funding from electric companies, which EWEB and EPUD <br />do not pay into and the Oregon Community Power entity. This may be an Energy Trust of <br />19 <br />