Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Ortiz felt that the provisions of the bill made sense as motorcycles riders were much less protected <br />than persons traveling inside of a larger vehicle. <br />Mr. Poling, speaking in his capacity as a former motorcycle rider, understood the rationale behind the bill <br />and noted he would support it. Ms. Piercy concurred with Mr. Poling’s statements and indicated she <br />would support the bill as well. <br />Ms. Wilson commented that recent testimony on HB 2554A had focused on the fact that there were many <br />drivers in Oregon who did not pay adequate attention to those persons that were classified as “vulnerable <br />users.” <br />Ms. Ortiz confirmed that the CCIGR would continue the staff recommended position of Priority 3 <br />support regarding HB 2554A. <br />SB 0556A – Relating to automated external defibrillators. <br />Ms. Wilson provided a brief description of SB 0556A to the committee members and noted that staff was <br />currently recommending Priority 3 opposition and Priority 3 Support positions regarding the bill. <br />Ms. Wilson reported that staff’s primary concern regarding SB 0556A was that it had not been worded <br />carefully and might cause confusion regarding the requirements for defibrillators with respect to public <br />assembly locations such as city parks and other areas not generally classified in terms of building square <br />footage. She further noted that the bill did not provide any funding for the defibrillators that it called for. <br />Ms. Wilson noted that staff had conferred with the City Attorney who had advised them that formal <br />support of SB 0556A might be advisable if the bill were amended with clarifying language regarding the <br />bills application to enclosed buildings versus open spaces such as parks and public walkways. <br />Ms. Wilson, responding to a question from Mr. Poling, noted that SB 0556A only applied to buildings <br />with a square footage in excess of 50,000 square feet. <br />Mr. Poling, seconded by Ms. Ortiz, moved to adopt a Priority 3 support <br />position of SB 0556A if amended. The motion passed unanimously, 2:0. <br />HB 2001 - Transportation bill <br />Ms. Wilson noted that IGR staff was reviewing HB 2001 which was a transportation bill to be combined <br />with a senate bill to increase payroll taxes for transit purposes. She further noted that the bill apparently <br />contained language that would preempt local gas taxes although the City of Eugene’s current gas taxes <br />would not be affected due to the grandfather clause of the bill. <br />Ms. Wilson commented that tan amendment had been introduced by 1000 Friends of Oregon and would <br />call for transportation and land use management that would take into consideration those planning tools <br />which ultimately reduced greenhouse gas emissions. <br />Ms. Wilson stated that staff was currently reviewing the provision of the proposal to determine how <br />much federal flex funding would be required to initiate the pilot program called for under the proposal. <br />She noted that the proposal might eventually turn into an unfunded mandate although it potentially gave <br />MPO’s the authority to determine how greenhouse gas planning strategies would function. <br />Ms. Wilson, responding to a comment from Ms. Piercy, noted that the proposal as it had been drafted <br />represented good policy but needed to have the details worked out more thoroughly. <br />MINUTES—Council Committee on Intergovernmental Relations May 6, 2009 Page 2 <br /> <br />