Laserfiche WebLink
to award a construction contract. His goal was to complete negotiations within a month and avoid any legal <br />proceedings related to eminent domain. <br /> <br />Ms. Solomon asked if the City would be at a disadvantage if it initiated proceedings first because of a recent <br />ballot measure. Mr. Schoening agreed that the ballot measure did put governments at more financial risk to <br />go through eminent domain. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy cautioned against taking the matter to Congressman De Fazio. She understood that there were <br />people who wanted other projects to take priority, but the City had applied under specific funding categories, <br />including one that created jobs and stimulated the economy, and should use the funds as planned. <br /> <br />Councilor Clark understood the value of creating jobs, but noted there were other higher priority projects <br />that could accomplish the same goal. He did not feel the bridge project was the best way to spend $6 <br />million. <br /> <br />Councilor Ortiz agreed with Mayor Piercy’s comments and did not want to delay a decision on the matter. <br />She asked what would happen with the funds if they were not spent on the designated project. Mr. <br />Schoening said the funds would be returned to the State for reallocation. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka determined that the City had asked Congressman De Fazio for funds earmarked for the <br />Delta Ponds bridge project. He would not support the motion. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor agreed with Mayor Piercy’s comments. She noted that the project had been planned for a <br />long time and the council should not delay its decision. <br /> <br />Councilor Pryor said he supported Councilor Clark’s concerns in principle, but he had been persuaded by <br />comments from other councilors and would not support the motion. <br /> <br />The motion to postpone failed, 7:1; Councilor Clark voting yes. Item 2E on the <br />Consent Calendar was approved, 7:1; Councilor Clark voting no. <br /> <br />Councilor Ortiz asked staff to elaborate on the status of legislation to curb metal theft. Intergovernmental <br />Affairs Manager Brenda Wilson replied that Senate Bill 570 had been passed by the Senate and referred to <br />the House for consideration. She noted that the entire Lane County legislative delegation supported the bill. <br /> <br />Councilor Ortiz commented on the problem that metal theft was in the community and acknowledged the <br />work of the legislative delegation to pass legislation to address the situation and thanked them for their <br />efforts. <br /> <br /> <br />Item 2F on the Consent Calendar passed unanimously, 8:0. <br /> <br />3. ACTION: <br /> <br />Ratification of Unanimous Intergovernmental Relations (IGR) Committee Actions and Discussion <br />and Action on Non-Unanimous IGR Actions on Legislative Policy from April 15 and April 22, <br />2009 <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka, seconded by Councilor Clark, moved to ratify the IGR Commit- <br />tee’s majority position of Prior 2 Oppose on HB 2865 related to collection of sys- <br />tem development charges by local governments. <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council April 27, 2009 Page 4 <br /> <br />