Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Ms. Wilson believed the bill was dead, although it was in the Revenue Committee. She said the bill had not <br />yet had a hearing and April 29 was the dead bill deadline. She said there was always a chance that the <br />language could be placed in another bill and asked the council for direction. <br /> <br />Councilor Poling moved to amend the motion to change the position to Priority 3 <br />Support. The motion died for lack of a second. <br /> <br />The main motion passed, 5:3; councilors Poling, Solomon and Brown voting no. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka, seconded by Councilor Clark, moved to ratify the IGR Commit- <br />tee’s majority position of Monitor on SB 519 prohibiting employers from taking <br />adverse employment action related to religious or political matters. <br /> <br />Ms. Wilson stated that SB 519 had passed out of committee that morning with an amendment that clarified <br />it did not prohibit mandatory meetings of executives or their administrative staff to discuss issues related to <br />religious or political matters. She noted the bill was introduced on behalf of a labor organization to prohibit <br />anti-union meetings and a requirement to attend those meetings with adverse action against employees who <br />chose not to participate. She said there would be a minority report on the bill. She said that concerns had <br />been expressed about the bill’s unintended consequences and potential preemption of the National Labor <br />Relations Act. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy asked if the latest version of the bill would still present a problem for employers. City <br />Attorney Glenn Klein said that a short discussion of the implications by legal counsel was included in the <br />agenda packet on page 181, but he was not certain if the recent changes to the bill had been reviewed. He <br />would request a review if the council wished. <br /> <br />Councilor Ortiz expressed concern with the bill and felt that a Monitor position was not adequate to assure <br />that employees’ rights were not in jeopardy. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Councilor Zelenka, Ms. Wilson explained that the amendment clarified that <br />the bill would not prohibit mandatory meetings of executives or administrative staff to talk about issues <br />related to the bill, but did not address any of the concerns raised by legal counsel. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka agreed with Councilor Ortiz regarding protection of employee’s right to refuse to <br />participate in things they objected to. He would support a motion to oppose. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy asked if a Monitor position would convey the council’s wish to see those employee protections <br />in place, but within the realm of what it was legal for the City to do. Ms. Wilson said she would convey <br />whatever message the council wished. She recommended a Neutral position for that message. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy said she wanted to express strong support for protection of people in the work place, while <br />protecting the City against legal problems. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka, seconded by Councilor Ortiz, moved to substitute a motion to <br />adopt a Neutral position on SB 519. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council April 27, 2009 Page 5 <br /> <br />