Laserfiche WebLink
ECLA: Baseline Assumptions ECONorthwest July 2009 Page 18 <br />continued growth in this type of housing could increase average household <br />size slightly across the City. The result of increased household size would be <br />an decrease in the number of new dwelling units needed to accommodate <br />Eugene’s expected population growth. <br />? <br />CAC and TAC discussion: Some CAC members think that we should assume <br /> <br />that household sizes will change in the future. CAC members have expressed <br />concern at development of buildings with more than the usual number of <br />bedrooms (five or six bedrooms) in the same dwelling unit. This creates higher <br />than normal persons per household in the neighborhoods with this type of <br />development, which creates other policy challenges for these neighborhoods <br />(e.g., parking availability). The housing needs analysis will discuss this trend. <br />? <br />Current technical recommendation for baseline assumption: We recommend <br /> <br />using the safe harbor assumption that household sizes will remain at 2.25 <br />persons per household. Forecasting future household sizes requires <br />considering a number of demographic and social shifts that are complex: <br />continued aging of the population, changes in ethnicity, and changes in <br />student housing preferences. The differences across the City over a 20 year <br />period will be relatively small. <br />? <br />Data source: The assumption about household size is based on a point in time <br /> <br />estimate based on 2007 U.S. Census, American Community Survey, data. <br />Residential vacancies <br />Housing vacancy rates are cyclical. Low vacancy rates signal an excess of demand <br />relative to supply, which brings new construction and, eventually, higher vacancy rates. <br />Vacancy rates for rental and multiple family units are typically higher than those for <br />owner-occupied and single-family dwelling units. <br />In 1990 the Census reported a vacancy rate for all housing of 3.6%, increasing to 5.4% <br />in 2000, and 6.3% in 2007. While it may appear that Eugene’s vacancy rate has increased <br />over the 1990 to 2007, Eugene’s vacancy rate has probably fluctuated throughout each <br />year. The Census’ vacancy rate data is accurate for the date of the Census (April 1) but <br />the vacancy rate may change significantly throughout the year based on activities at the <br />University of Oregon. For example, Eugene may have a higher vacancy rate in July, <br />when most students have left town, and a lower vacancy rate in October, with the start <br />of the University’s school year. <br />Since state law and this project requires a 20-year forecast, and one should expect <br />several housing cycles during that period, this project should be looking for an average <br />vacancy rate (the “natural” rate of vacancy). OAR 660-024 established a “safe harbor” <br />assumption for average residential vacancies—which is the figure from the most recent <br />Census. <br /> <br /> <br />