My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item C: Eugene Comprehensive Lands Assessment
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2009
>
CC Agenda - 07/22/09 Work Session
>
Item C: Eugene Comprehensive Lands Assessment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:18:49 PM
Creation date
7/17/2009 11:16:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
7/22/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ECLA: Baseline Assumptions ECONorthwest July 2009 Page 24 <br />Residential redevelopment <br />The City of Eugene has a legal obligation to inventory the supply and estimate the <br />capacity of buildable land within the UGB. The inventory must consider land that may <br />be used for residential infill and redevelopment. The City does have an obligation <br />not <br />14 <br />to “create a map or document that may be used to verify and identify specific lots or <br />parcels that have been determined to be buildable lands” to show residential infill and <br />15 <br />redevelopment. <br />OAR 660-008-0005(6) defines redevelopable land as “land zoned for residential use on <br />which development has already occurred but on which, due to present or expected <br />market forces, there exists the strong likelihood that existing development will be <br />converted to more intensive residential uses during the planning period.” The <br />administrative rule does not define what constitutes a “strong likelihood” for <br />redevelopment. <br />Moreover, neither Goal 10, OAR 660-008, nor ORS 197.296 define “infill.” Planners <br />and Oregon land-use policy have seemed to define infill as either (1) development that <br />occurs in areas that are already largely developed, or (2) development that occurs on <br />“partially vacant” land. Both of those informal definitions have problems. The first one <br />has no agreed upon, much less legally adopted, way of being measured. The second one <br />requires a definition of partially vacant (generally agreed to mean taxlots that have <br />some development, but less—perhaps substantially less—than plan and zone <br />designations would allow, and some amount of vacant acreage—perhaps as little as a <br />quarter acre that might be feasibly developed). <br />For the purposes of this study, we define residential redevelopment as development <br />that (1) occurs on land with existing development, and (2) results in a net increase in <br />dwelling units. The second condition means that the replacement of one dwelling unit <br />with one other dwelling unit would not be counted. This definition includes infill on <br />partially vacant land where there is no demolition, as well as redevelopment that <br />requires demolition of existing structures. Examples of residential redevelopment <br />include: (1) demolition of a single-family dwelling and development of a duplex or <br />apartment building, and (2) partitioning a lot with a single-family house and building a <br />new single-family dwelling on the newly created lot. <br />16 <br />Appendix C describes potential methodologies for evaluating the amount of <br />redevelopment that occurred historically, as well as discussion with the CAC about the <br /> <br /> <br /> The legal requirements are described in ORS 197.296(3)(a) and (4)(a)(D). <br />14 <br /> Quoted from ORS 197. 296(4)(c). <br />15 <br /> Subdividing a lot and building an additional dwelling is sometimes referred to as infill. For the purposes of this <br />16 <br />study, we have categorized this type of development as redevelopment. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.