Laserfiche WebLink
Mayor Piercy surmised that the bill was not moving in the Legislature. She commented, for the record, that <br />she did not like either one of the ballot measures that had been submitted to the popular vote. She thought <br />they did “a big disservice to the State.” While she wanted people to be held accountable, she felt the <br />measures were a drain on resources. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka concurred. He thought it was internally inconsistent to say on one hand that we should <br />not support a bill because of a lack of jail space and, on the other hand, to oppose the repeal of a bill that <br />would jail more offenders. <br /> <br />Roll call vote; the motion passed, 5:3; councilors Brown, Zelenka, and Taylor voting in op- <br />position. <br /> <br />House Bill 2875 – Would allow a taxpayer to elect to defer payment of increased property taxes <br />attributable to annexation of property by a city. <br /> <br />Ms. Wilson said the bill would allow for deferral of taxes for a ten-year period after the effective date of <br />annexation. She stated that staff had recommended adoption of a Priority 2 Oppose position, which was in <br />line with adopted legislative policies. She related that Councilor Taylor had made a motion to change the <br />position to Support, but had not received a second. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka, seconded by Councilor Clark, moved to adopt a position of Priority 2 <br />Oppose on House Bill 2875. <br /> <br />Councilor Clark asked who sponsored the bill. Ms. Wilson replied that Senator Vicki Walker and <br />Representatives Chris Edwards and Mitch Greenlick had sponsored it. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy did not believe it was necessary to take a position on the bill. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor thought they should support it because she believed “it was only fair.” She averred that a <br />person who was annexed should not have to be subjected to an increase in property taxes. <br /> <br />Councilor Ortiz pointed out that the City of Eugene did not annex people against their will. She preferred <br />adoption of a neutral stance on the bill. <br /> <br />Councilor Clark, seconded by Councilor Taylor, moved to substitute a motion to adopt a <br />Priority 2 Support position on the bill. <br /> <br />Councilor Clark believed that the way the ‘190 agreements’ were set up with the County, someone who <br />wanted to build substantially, was forced to annex to the City. He said it was a difficult choice. He <br />commented that he would prefer that the County resume responsibility for permitting for county residents. <br />He thought the bill would provide a reasonable way to help such construction be more affordable. <br /> <br />Councilor Poling could not support the substitute motion. He read staff comments provided by Senior <br />Management Analyst for the Finance Division Larry Hill which indicated that the bill would allow any <br />owner of recently annexed property to defer City property taxes for up to ten years, and the state would have <br />a lien against the property. He related that after ten years or when the property was sold, the deferred taxes <br />plus interest would be payable to the Oregon Department of Revenue. He stated that no additional money <br />would be appropriated to cover the bill’s financial impact to the County and City. He considered the bill to <br />be bad legislation. <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council April 13, 2009 Page 14 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />