Laserfiche WebLink
Roll call vote; the substitute motion failed, 6:2; councilors Clark and Taylor voting in favor. <br /> <br />Roll call vote; the original motion to adopt a Priority 2 Oppose position passed, 6:2; counci- <br />lors Taylor and Clark voting in opposition. <br /> <br />House Bill 2961 – Would allow a municipality to impose local requirements for construction of new <br />structures that would be more stringent than state building code. <br /> <br />Ms. Wilson stated that staff had recommended adoption of a neutral stance on the bill. She related that <br />Councilor Poling wished to change this to a Priority 3 Oppose because he felt the statewide building code <br />should be consistent and this motion had resulted in a 2:1 vote with Councilor Taylor dissenting. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka, seconded by Councilor Clark, moved to adopt a Priority 3 Oppose posi- <br />tion on House Bill 2961. Roll call vote; the motion passed, 6:2; councilors Taylor and Or- <br />tiz voting in opposition. <br /> <br />House Bill 2979 – Would require that places of public accommodation allow customer access to <br />employee toilet facilities if a customer had certain medical conditions and provided for a punishment of <br />a maximum fine of $90 for violations. <br /> <br />Ms. Wilson stated that staff had recommended a Priority 3 Oppose position. She related that Councilor <br />Ortiz had moved to monitor the bill and had not received a second. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy asked Ms. Wilson to review the conditions included in the bill. Ms. Wilson explained that the <br />list included use of any ostomy device, Krohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, and any inflammatory bowel <br />disease. She said one issue raised by staff was that the bill provided no way for an employee of a public <br />facility to know whether or not a person had one of those medical conditions. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy commented that in the case of someone with an extreme medical condition it did seem <br />unreasonable to deny access to a restroom. She suggested that they choose to monitor the bill or to ask for <br />an amendment requiring that a person carry an affidavit regarding their condition. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka, seconded by Councilor Clark, moved to adopt a Priority 3 Oppose posi- <br />tion to House Bill 2979. <br /> <br />Councilor Ortiz asked where the bill was going. Ms. Wilson replied that it was not moving. <br /> <br />Councilor Poling said the reason he opposed the bill was that it would allow customers access to employee <br />toilet facilities. He pointed out that public restrooms were required to meet Americans with Disabilities Act <br />(ADA). He felt that employees should not be exposed to unnecessary risks and, as such, he could not <br />support the bill. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Councilor Zelenka, Ms. Wilson said the bill did not explain how someone <br />would determine if a person should have the right to access an employee bathroom. She remarked that it <br />was a difficult bill to administer. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka thought the bill came from a good intent but was badly executed. <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council April 13, 2009 Page 15 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />