Laserfiche WebLink
on the riverfront district was unknown. She explained that it would require 50 percent of the increment to be <br />added to the assessed value of a property. <br /> <br />Councilor Brown observed that the purpose of the urban renewal program was to increase values of <br />properties that were undervalued. He found it interesting that there were bills “popping up” that seemed to <br />want to reexamine urban renewal and he thought it was a good idea to do so. <br /> <br />Councilor Clark said he would support the motion, but he agreed that they should have a discussion on <br />urban renewal. He noted his opposition to urban renewal. <br /> <br />Roll call vote; the motion passed, 6:2; councilors Brown and Taylor voting in opposition. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka, seconded by Councilor Clark, moved to ratify the Intergovernmental <br />Committee’s unanimous actions on bills and approval of staff recommendations in the <br />March 11, and April 1, 2009, Intergovernmental Relations Bill Reports for bills not pulled <br />for discussion at those Intergovernmental Relations Committee meetings. Roll call vote; the <br />motion passed unanimously, 8:0. <br /> <br />Councilor Clark, seconded by Councilor Zelenka, moved to extend the meeting by 15 mi- <br />nutes. Roll call vote; the motion passed, 7:1, Councilor Taylor voting in opposition. <br /> <br />4. ACTION: <br /> <br />Approval of Minutes, Findings and Recommendations from the Hearings Official and Adoption of <br />Resolution 4970 Forming a Local Improvement District for Paving, Constructing Curbs, Gutters, <br />Sidewalks, Street Lights, Stormwater Drainage, Water Quality Facilities, on Elmira Road from <br />Bertelsen Road to Maple Street and Maple Street from Elmira Road to Roosevelt Boulevard (Job <br /># 4275 <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka, seconded by Councilor Clark, moved to approve the Hearings Official <br />minutes, findings, and recommendations dated April 9, 2009 and to adopt Resolution 4970 <br />forming a Local Improvement District for paving, constructing curbs, gutters, sidewalks, <br />street lights, stormwater drainage, water quality facilities, on Elmira Road from Bertelsen <br />Road to Maple Street and Maple Street from Elmira Road to Roosevelt Boulevard (Job <br />#4275). <br /> <br />Mr. Schoening acknowledged that there was strong support for the project, but the issue was really about <br />the cost of the assessments. He noted that when assessments had been discussed at the work session held <br />earlier in the year, assessments for the Elmira Road project were estimated to be $180 per front foot and <br />$200 per front foot for the Crest project. He reported that the bids had come in at 28 percent less and <br />assessments for the Elmira/Maple project had fallen to $125 per front foot. He explained that this meant it <br />would cost $6,250 for a 50-foot frontage and the average cost for a residence was $9,800. He reiterated <br />that the City was paying $2.1 million, two-thirds of the cost, from SDCs. <br /> <br />Mr. Schoening shared the councilors concerns that people should not lose a house over the street improve- <br />ments. He stated that the council instituted a low-income assistance program several years earlier which <br />would provide a subsidy that ranged from one-third to five-sixths of the cost for single-family homes that <br />were owner-occupied. He said 34 property owners had qualified for this assistance. He noted that there <br />would be a second opportunity to apply. <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council April 13, 2009 Page 17 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />