Laserfiche WebLink
Councilor Pryor commented that anyone could come into a public place and claim they had irritable bowel <br />syndrome or ulcerative colitis and it would be impossible to prove. He did not think the state would begin to <br />issue cards proving that a person had one of these disorders. He could not support the bill. <br /> <br />Roll call vote; the motion passed, 7:1; Councilor Ortiz voting in opposition. <br /> <br />House Bill 3031 – Would extend local government approval of residential development permits for two <br />years. <br /> <br />Ms. Wilson related that staff had recommended adoption of a neutral stance because the City Council had <br />not taken a position on it. She said Councilor Poling had made a motion to adopt a Priority 3 Support <br />position and had not received a second. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka, seconded by Councilor Clark, moved to adopt a neutral position on <br />House Bill 3031. <br /> <br />Councilor Poling, seconded by Councilor Clark, moved to amend the motion to change the <br />position to Priority 3 Support. <br /> <br />Councilor Poling said he supported the bill because it would extend the expiration date for residential <br />developments for two years beyond the present expiration. He thought that given the current economic <br />times, it would be prudent to be more lenient on projects that were not completed on time. He did not think <br />this would create a financial impact on the City. He noted that other jurisdictions were doing this. <br /> <br />Councilor Solomon concurred. <br /> <br />Councilor Clark averred that it made sense to keep the plumbers, roofers, and framers working. He said if a <br />project had already received its permit, it would be good to give the builders some extra time to get the <br />financing. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Councilor Zelenka, Ms. Wilson stated that while the bill did not include a <br />specific sunset, it would only apply to those permits that would expire on or after the effective date of the act <br />and before July 1, 2011. <br /> <br />Roll call vote; the amendment passed, 6:2; councilors Taylor and Brown voting in opposi- <br />tion. <br /> <br />House Bill 3056 – Would require a 50 percent increment to be added to the total assessed value of <br />property within urban renewal area whenever the increment equaled the total assessed value. <br /> <br />Ms. Wilson stated that staff had recommended a Priority 2 Oppose position because this was in line with <br />adopted legislative policies. She said Councilor Taylor had moved to change this to a Priority 2 Support <br />and had not received a second. She noted that Councilor Taylor indicated that she wanted to support the bill <br />because she believed it would provide more money for the General Fund. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka, seconded by Councilor Clark, moved to adopt a Priority 2 Oppose posi- <br />tion on House Bill 3056. <br /> <br />Councilor Brown asked what financial effect the bill would have on the downtown area. Ms. Wilson replied <br />that staff had reported that the bill would have an immediate impact on the downtown district and the impact <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council April 13, 2009 Page 16 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />