Laserfiche WebLink
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE METHODOLOGY <br /> <br />The example reimbursement fee cost basis includes 10 percent ($5 million) of existing <br />system value, associated with providing 5 mgd of capacity. The improvement fee cost basis <br />includes the costs to expand the facilities by 10 mgd, in this case estimated to be $12 million. <br />The total costs allocated to growth are equal to the total capacity required by growth (5 mgd <br />existing +10 mgd expansion) = 15 mgd total. <br /> <br />At this point the SDC schedule can be developed. First, the weighted average unit costs are <br />developed. This is accomplished by dividing the reimbursement fee and improvement fee <br />cost bases by the total growth capacity units (15 mgd in this case). By dividing the individual <br />fee elements by the total growth units, the combined fee is based on a weighted average cost <br />per unit. This is demonstrated in Table 2 where the individual unit costs are $333,000 per <br />mgd ($5 million/15 mgd) and $800,000 per mgd ($12 million/15 mgd), respectively, for <br />reimbursement and improvement elements; and $1.1 million per mgd ($17 million/15 mgd) <br />overall. The SDC for a user who requires 350 gallons per day (.000350 mgd) would equal <br />$116.67 reimbursement ($333,333 X 0.000350) + $280 improvement ($800,000 X 0.00035) for a <br />total of $396.67. The same fee would result from using the total cost per unit ($1.13 per <br />gallon per day) multiplied by the 350-gallon-per-day user requirements. <br /> <br />As the example demonstrates, the methodology meets the key requirements of the law, as <br />identified in Table 1: <br /> <br />· Determines the amount of available capacity that exists and allocates costs to growth <br /> accordingly. <br /> <br />· Allocates improvement costs to growth in proportion to future capacity needs. <br /> <br />· Does not recover the costs of the same capacity through the reimbursement and <br /> improvement fees. Recovers cost associated with existing capacity through the <br /> reimbursement fee, and recovers costs associated with new capacity through the <br /> improvement fee. The charges to individual developments are based on a weighted <br /> average cost of capacity. <br /> <br />Each element of the methodology is discussed in more detail below. <br /> <br />Methodology Element One: Determine Growth Capacity Needs <br />The Oregon SDC law requires explicit analysis of capacity required to serve growth-and <br />demonstration of how those capacity needs will be met through existing and future <br />facilities. Therefore, it is necessary to first determine the appropriate capacity parameter(s), <br />and growth's capacity requirements. <br /> <br /> Step One- Capacity Parameters <br /> The appropriate capacity measure relates to the sizing criteria of the wastewater system, and <br /> may, to improve equity, require consideration of multiple parameters to assess the impact of <br /> the utility's various types of users. As wastewater systems must be sized to meet all of their <br /> customers' demands, flows and strength loadings are important sizing criteria. MWMC <br /> provides service to a diverse customer base, so consideration of varying flow and load <br /> requirements of different customer types is one facet that ensures the equity of the SDCs. <br /> <br /> The four capacity measures or parameters used in the methodology are: <br /> <br /> SEA31003271388(DG).DOC/041040034 <br /> <br /> <br />