My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 4 - PH on MWMC Reg. SDCs
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2004
>
CCAgenda-06/14/04Mtg
>
Item 4 - PH on MWMC Reg. SDCs
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:10:03 PM
Creation date
6/10/2004 3:21:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
6/14/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE METHODOLOGY <br /> <br /> The project cost allocation methodology provides an equitable basis for determining the <br /> projects or portions of projects that are related to growth capacity needs and are, thereby, <br /> included in the improvement fee portion of the SDC calculation. The methodology is not <br /> tied to a specific list of projects intended to be funded by SDCs (20-year project list), but is <br /> intended to provide a consistent framework for allocation of future projects to growth. <br /> <br /> Each step of the methodology is described below. The general allocation process is also <br /> presented graphically in Figure 3. <br /> <br /> FIGURE 3--PROJECT COST ALLCOATION <br /> <br /> 20.¥e ProjeCt List <br /> · <br /> <br />STEP M .. <br /> <br />STEPI-2 <br /> <br />STEP I-4 · · <br /> <br /> % of Total Future % of Capacity <br /> Allocation Basis Load 0O/o Expansion <br /> <br /> The allocation of future projects to facility process components is generally fairly <br /> straightforward, as most projects relate directly to an individual component or support the <br /> entire treatment system. The refinement of the facility component allocation process for <br /> MWMC relates to recognition of peak flow management costs. While it is likely that future <br /> project lists will include projects entirely related to peak flow management, it is also likely <br /> that portions of projects relating to various aspects of the treatment process (e.g., secondary <br /> treatment) will also play a role in future peak flow management. <br /> <br /> The following question needs to be answered when allocating project costs to facility <br /> components: "Which specific facility component does the project expand or improve?" If the <br /> project expands or improves more than one facility component, then project costs should be <br /> apportioned relative to the expansion or improvement of each applicable component. <br /> <br /> SEA31003271388(DG).DOC/041040034 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.