Item 5 - Ratify MWMC Budget - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

need to integrate all of the planned capital projects to avoid any potential internal conflicts in objectives and to take advantage of opportunities to leverage economies of scale and infrastructure efficiencies. This need caused the Commission to expand the scope of CH2M HILL's contract to generate a formal update of the Facilities Plan. The expanded scope directed CH2M HILL to integrate the projects related to the WWFMP, the Biosolids Management Plan, and the updated regulatory-based analyses and follow the formal DEQ guidelines for Facilities Plans. The end product, a state-approved Facilities Plan, is a requirement for eligibility for many State and Federal grant and loan programs. MWMC began its review of the recommendations from the Facilities Plan work in November, 2003, at a special evening interactive workshop that was advertised through the newspapers and via direct mailings to potential interested parties. Attendees at the workshop were added to the interested parties list for the project. The Commission reviewed and provided further guidance on the plan at its January, 2004, meeting, and an additional evening open house was advertised and conducted on March 3, 2004. Answers to questions raised by the public were prepared and distributed to interested parties. The Commission held a public hearing on April 22nd and continued it to May 6th to provide additional time for written and/or oral comment to be submitted. Press releases, direct mailers, display ads, and legal notices were all used as appropriate. Please see the attached sample of materials that document this process. (Attachment C: Facilities Plan Public Outreach and lnvolvement Activities) SDC Methodology Update Projects: 1997 and 2004 A 12-member CAC was appointed by the Commission in 1996 to review and update the systems development charge methodology used for the regional wastewater program. The CAC met 13 times in 1996-97 and forwarded a consensus recommendation to the Commission. The meetings were advertised and a public comment period was provided at all of the CAC meetings. Public hearings were advertised and conducted by the Commission and the two City Councils, and the methodology was subsequently adopted by each body without opposition. In 2002, MWMC initiated a change in the methodology to include 10 years of capital project costs in the SDC calculations rather than the 5 years provided for by the 1997 methodology. This change was not implemented under threat of litigation by the Home Builders Association of Lane County (HBA). The two Cities, MWMC, and the HBA entered into a settlement agreement in September, 2003. That agreement provided for continuation of the 5-year list of projects and a facilities valuation current as of July, 2002. The settlement agreement also directed a timely update of the SDC methodology, with the involvement of a CAC, such that a new methodology could be in place for implementation July 1, 2004. As raised by Councilor Bettman at the May 24th Council meeting, the current SDC revenues do not reflect the total costs of capital projects that will be needed to provide for community growth over the next 20 years. This was true under the 1997 methodology, which was based on a 5-year project list, and with the current interim methodology as established under the settlement agreement. In October, 2003, the Commission appointed a 14-member CAC to update the SDC methodology in a manner that would: (1) comply with new statutes that take effect July 1, 2004; (2) provide equity among existing and future users; and (3) provide revenue adequacy. This CAC met 9 times between October, 2003, and March, 2004. The meetings were public, and the CAC included a public comment period at each meeting. Galardi Consulting and CH2M HILL provided technical guidance to the project, and LCOG facilitated the CAC.