My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 5 - Ratify MWMC Budget
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2004
>
CCAgenda-06/14/04Mtg
>
Item 5 - Ratify MWMC Budget
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:48:01 PM
Creation date
6/10/2004 3:21:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
6/14/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
W~T WEATHER FLOW MANAGEMENT PLAN <br /> <br />The purpose of the CAC, as stated at the onset of the project, was to: <br /> <br /> · Become educated <br /> <br /> Reflect community values/concerns through the optimization process <br /> <br />· Assist in evaluating desirability and priority of alternative solutions <br /> <br />· Provide recommendations to MWMC <br /> <br />· Assist with communication and public awareness <br /> <br />In addition, the CAC was asked to address the following policy issues: <br />· Levels of protection against overflows and bypasses and environmental standards <br /> <br />· How to accomplish the best flow management plan systemwide, given multiple <br /> jurisdictions and MWMC <br /> <br />· How to address cost and other potential differences among user groups <br /> <br />· How to address private laterals :' <br /> <br />The CAC has succeeded in performing these functions and has provided the following: <br /> <br />· Guidance to the process of WWFMP development <br /> <br />· Generation of and assistance in the formulation and refinement of policy issues and <br /> statements <br /> <br /> Review and approval of recommended sub.basin and systemwide solutions, including <br /> secondary treatment levels <br /> <br />$.2 Alternatives Development <br /> <br />The CAC discussed a wide variety.of means to reduce peak flows in the system. At the time <br />these options were .considered, a significant amount of information was presented at the <br />initial CAC meetings regarding the charact~a, stics, sources, and magnitude of wet we~tther <br />flows as well as how the system performed under severe wet weather conditions. <br />Operational options available to manage high flows and limit system overflows also were <br />provided. This information was provided relative to treatment plant processes and <br />associated capacities in addition to historic and.projected information regarding collection <br />system performance under extreme flow conditions. Peak flow rates.and volumes were <br />discussed relative to various means of controlling wet weather flow. Initially, the options <br />considered were not limited to the traditional solutions of storage, treatment and collection <br />system capacity increases, and reduction of I/I through existing pipe rehabilitation~ Other <br />flow control methods discussed included: <br /> <br />· Water conservation measures to reduce system flows (composting toilets and'gray-water <br /> recycling) <br /> <br />· Satellite treatment systems that do not rely on the existing collection or treatment <br /> systems <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.