Laserfiche WebLink
Beth du/650 infill du)The infill rate (based on this definition) is about 10% (6500 interested in that type of development.The data seem suspect, and I don't think we are that I eliminated <br />some classes of DU: all mobile homes and hotels. increase might be of interest.The densities don't really mean much, although the marginal <br />ECLA: Baseline Assumptions ECONorthwest July 2009 Page 26 <br />Table 7 shows that between 2001 and 2008 a total of 722 new dwelling units occurred <br />on tax lots that already had dwellings. Of these, 213 were on lots that had retirement <br />homes, and 220 were on lots that had single-family dwellings. All of the remaining <br />units were on lots with some type of multi-family dwellings. <br />Table 7. Residential redevelopment: new dwellings on <br />developed lots, Eugene UGB, 2001-2008 <br />Existing <br />Existing Unit TypeDUNew DU <br />Apartment With 1 To 4 Units13381 <br />Apartment With 20 Units or More33944 <br />Apartment With 5 To 19 Units38977 <br />Condominiums or Townhouses352 <br />Quad1110 <br />Retirement Home170213 <br />Single Family Housing230220 <br />Two Family Housing Unit-Duplex7275 <br /> Total1379722 <br /> <br />Source: LCOG taxlot and address data; analysis by ECONorthwest <br />Based on the results we estimate that about 722 new dwellings were constructed <br />between 2001 and 2008 that could be considered redevelopment. This is about 11% of all <br />housing production during the 2001 to 2008 period. New dwellings constructed on lots <br />with pre-existing development is among the best indicators of redevelopment available <br />because it provides an actual unit count of new housing by housing type for the <br />analysis period. This number may overestimate the actual redevelopment on these lots; <br />some new dwellings may have been part of a phased development—particularly <br />apartments. Despite these limitations, we feel this indicator is one of the more reliable <br />redevelopment indicators. <br />? <br />Potential range of assumption: The data suggest that approximately 11% of all <br /> <br />housing production during the 2001 to 2008 period were the result of <br />redevelopment. <br />? <br />CAC and TAC discussion: CAC has discussed the redevelopment analysis at <br /> <br />the May and June CAC meetings. These discussions are on-going but expected <br />to be concluded soon. <br />? <br />Current technical recommendation for baseline assumption: We recommend <br /> <br />assuming about 11% of all new housing will be accommodated through <br />redevelopment, about 1,650 new dwelling units. <br />? <br />Data source: LCOG GIS data and City of Eugene Planning Department’s <br /> <br />building permit data. <br /> <br /> <br />