Laserfiche WebLink
unjust process.” <br /> <br />Marion Eddie <br />, 830 Crest Drive, Ward 2, urged the council to rethink the street assessment policy. She <br />believed it would be best to postpone the street project in order to “revamp” the City statute. She <br />acknowledged the work that had gone into the road design and understood that the people who worked on it <br />did not want it to be for nothing. She agreed with that. She said if they were talking about hard work, they <br />should also consider the hard work that the families who would be assessed for the road costs were doing to <br />support their homes and families. She pointed out that these people were now being asked to produce an <br />additional $10,000 to $20,000. She asked the council to consider whether 300 volunteer hours “for a few <br />individuals” were more important than the “thousands of hours of additional payroll work for 100 families.” <br />She opined that the timing was especially bad, given the current rate of unemployment locally. She asked <br />the council to give consideration to the “families who were frightened to death” of the assessment. She <br />asked the City to, at a minimum, “dig deep” and come up with more funding to help them. <br /> <br />Bill Eddie <br />, 830 Crest Drive, Ward 2, also spoke to the assessment issue. He averred that the council had <br />been informed by testimony and a remonstrance signed by 86 citizens that the majority faced with the <br />assessment felt it was unfair and unaffordable. He related some of the councilors’ comments regarding the <br />assessment policy from the March 9 work session that indicated agreement that the assessments could be <br />construed as unfair and unwieldy. He believed that the comments showed that even the councilors were <br />uncomfortable with the assessment policy. He declared that the time seemed right to change “this wrong.” <br />He underscored that road projects would “go on forever” and the council would face them again. He hoped <br />the councilors’ statements would translate into a fair and affordable assessment policy. <br /> <br />Steven Mayberry <br />, 3439 Storey Boulevard, stated that he had bought his house approximately nine years <br />earlier. He had emailed all of the councilors. He stressed that he and his wife were public school teachers <br />with two children and an older relative living with them. He said they were taking out a second mortgage to <br />pay for the street assessment, because paying for it would “devastate” them financially. He did not <br />understand the idea that because 90 percent of the people in Eugene had already been assessed in this <br />manner, it would be unfair to change the law to save the last 10 percent from the assessment. He believed <br />that if citizens had to worry about fairness in that way, no laws would ever be changed. He agreed with <br />Councilor Taylor that it was an unfair system. He asserted that the way street repairs were paid for would <br />have to change. <br /> <br />Marlene Varady <br />, 420 Crest Drive, quoted William Shakespeare as having said “the people are the city.” <br />She underscored the request of the people in the Crest Drive area for the council to consider all of their <br />petitions. She appreciated that they had been able to come together to present to the council its petition for <br />change. She acknowledged that they were asking the council to enact a big change. She believed it would <br />be a large change for the future. She noted that she lived across from the Wayne Morse Family Farm and <br />asked them to consider what Wayne Morse would have wanted. <br /> <br />Toby Gamberoni <br />, 691 Crest Drive, urged the council to delay the Crest Drive/Storey Boulevard/Friendly <br />Street project. He encouraged the City to consider a citywide tax for future projects. He believed that the <br />current assessment system was “possibly unfair and definitely outdated.” He related that he was being <br />assessed $7,500 for 17.5 feet of access road, the minimum charge. He asserted that 71 to 85 percent of the <br />people using the roads were not being asked to pay for it. He supported the institution of the garbage hauler <br />fee and a commensurate change in how assessments were charged. <br /> <br />Richard Wohlberg <br />, 310 Crest Drive, encouraged the council not to build the road currently. He did not <br />want to cut off all of the efforts that people had made to design the road. He hoped that just the delay would <br />go through. He noted the difficulty that people were experiencing in getting loans at present, which made it <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council June 8, 2009 Page 2 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />