CC Minutes - 06/08/09 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Councilor Zelenka asked if the cost had been estimated for the fund. Ms. Wilson replied that there was no discussion of cost. She noted that there was some concern expressed that one community could come in and take it all. Councilor Zelenka asked if there was a provision that would prohibit this. Ms. Wilson responded that it was not in the current version, but if the bill started to move it would have to include such a provision. Councilor Zelenka indicated he would oppose the motion. He did not believe it was the appropriate way to fund infrastructure and he did not like that there was no provision preventing one jurisdiction from taking it all. Roll call vote; the motion failed, 5:3; councilors Pryor, Poling, and Ortiz voting in favor. Ms. Wilson pointed out that the City had indicated that it had adopted a Priority 2 Support position on the former version of the bill. Councilor Zelenka, seconded by Councilor Clark, moved to adopt a Priority 2 Oppose position on SB719A. Roll call vote; the vote was a tie, 4:4; councilors Brown, Zelenka, Clark, and Solomon voting in favor and councilors Taylor, Ortiz, Poling, and Pryor voting in opposition. Mayor Piercy voted in favor of adopting a Priority 2 Oppose position on SB719A and the motion passed. Councilor Zelenka, seconded by Councilor Clark, moved to adopt a Priority 2 Oppose position on House Bill (HB) 2699A. Ms. Wilson explained that the bill would modify the definition of “public works” and would classify exemptions from ad valorem property taxation for the purpose of imposing prevailing wage requirements and extend the exemption to projects that were at least $5 million and were sited in Enterprise Zones. She underscored that prevailing wage was not the same as living wage. Councilor Zelenka noted that the bill had been sponsored by Eugene Representative Paul Holvey. He asked what the amendments to the bill had been. Ms. Wilson replied that the newest version had removed the requirement that the payment of prevailing wages be in connection with public works for which funds of a public agency were used including funds received in the form of tax credits. She said it also removed the provision that would exempt projects that were privately owned and that used private funds and instead clarified the exemption from ad valorem property tax. She listed some of the other stipulations in the bill. In response to a question from Councilor Zelenka, Ms. Wilson read the definitions of ‘public works’ from the language in Section 1(H)(6)(a) of HB2699A. Councilor Zelenka surmised that by removing the prevailing wage requirement, any public infrastructure program or project would not have to pay that wage. Ms. Wilson replied that it would apply as long as a project met the other requirement of being in an Enterprise Zone. Mr. Ruiz asked that the item be tabled so that Legal Counsel could caucus with Ms. Wilson. Councilor Clark asked Ms. Wilson to state the difference between prevailing wage and living wage. He also requested that she bring back the financial impact the bill could have. MINUTES—Eugene City Council June 8, 2009 Page 5 Regular Meeting