Laserfiche WebLink
RESPONSE: Please see responses to Mayor Torrey's questions on this subject. <br /> <br />Phil Barnhart, 182 Sunset Drive, State Representative for House District 11, spoke in support of Coburg <br />position on the issue of the potential expansion of the MWMC to include them. He called Coburg an <br />"economic engine" for the area with people moving back and forth over the "artificial boundaries" created by <br />government all of the time. He urged the City Councils of Eugene and Springfield and the Lane County Board <br />of Commissioners to consider an expansion, over the course of this project, to include the City of Coburg. He <br />felt a pipeline between Coburg and Eugene would not be a difficult undertaking and would ultimately provide <br />cost savings. <br /> <br />RESPONSE: Please see responses to Mayor Torrey's questions on this subject. <br /> <br />Diana Abernathey, 2620 Oak Street, expressed appreciation for the councilors service to the community. She <br />averred there may not be adequate protection of the water quality of the Willamette River. She urged support <br />for the plan before the council. She said a great deal of money had already been spent in determining technical <br />options, costing them out, and selecting the best of them. She called the process efficient and effective and <br />said the staff members, with input from citizen advisors, had selected the least cost alternative that would meet <br />the new federal guide lines. She commented that, while some complain of the high cost of the proposed <br />infrastructure, the health of the river was priceless. She said it was shocking to consider that the City would <br />plan to violate the discharge permit and pay the fines. She called this "highly irresponsible stewardship." She <br />stated that, due to a history of effective and forward thinking planning of infrastructure, the current SDC rates <br />were among the lowest in the State. She underscored that the best plan had been identified and any "foot- <br />dragging" would only result in a greater cost to the public. <br /> <br />RESPONSE: The intergovernmental agreement establishing the MWMC expressly requires the MWMC to <br />"Comply with state and federal standards." The 2004 MWMC Facilities Plan and 20-Year Project List are <br />intended to maintain compliance with all applicable state and federal standards, the MWMC has not ever <br />planned to violate the discharge permit and pay fines. <br /> <br />Steve Greenwood, 2169 Essex Lane, introduced himself as a former State regulator and a member of the <br />Willamette Restoration Initiative Board of Directors and a public policy consultant. He echoed the last <br />speaker's sentiments and underscored that all of the effluent eventually went into the river. He stated that <br />much of the Willamette River had very poor quality as defined by DEQ standards, with some areas of the main <br />stem violating the levels for temperature, bacteria, and mercury levels. He stated that significant regulatory <br />changes had taken place since 1977 and it was time to update the Facilities Plan. Regarding the cost, he agreed <br />that $144 million sounded like a lot of money, but emphasized that it was in line with what other communities <br />were spending. He added that, as a professional in the field, he found the staff and organization of the MWMC <br />was one that tried to reduce their costs as much as possible. <br /> <br /> Camilla Pratt, 120 Westbrook Way, explained that she had served on a citizens advisory committee for the <br /> Wet Weather Flow Management Plan for two years. She related that the committee had studied many aspects <br /> of the plan and, in addition to meeting the requirements of State and Federal agencies, the committee was <br /> concerned with the fairness of the plan, including its ability to be understood by various customer classes and <br /> its ability to be administered effectively. She stated that the plan, completed in 2001, had been adopted by the <br /> MWMC and the Cities of Eugene and Springfield. Since then, she said several more years of careful <br /> investigation and analysis had been invested in other aspects of the MWMC Facilities Plan and 20-Year <br /> Project List. She called it the obligation and responsibility of Eugene to ensure a high quality water resource <br /> for the needs of all downstream users. <br /> <br /> Larry Gunn, 32555 Beymer Road, spoke in support of the MWMC Facilities Plan. He opined that the cost <br /> seemed reasonable and that it seemed the time was right for the Council to endorse the plan. He recommended <br /> doing the work now and not in the future when it would cost more. <br /> <br /> <br />