Laserfiche WebLink
IvIWMC FACILITIES PLAN <br /> <br />5.4 Design Capacity of Conveyance System and <br /> Wastewater Treatment Plant <br /> <br />5.4.1 Conveyance System <br />Conveyance system alternatives were developed and evaluated in the WWFMP (CH2M <br />HILL, 2000). The current facilities planning effort foc~ased on the analysis of wastewater <br />treatment alternatives regarding influent pumping, preliminary and primary treatment, <br />secondary treatment, disinfection, and biosolids management. <br /> <br />As part of the current facility planning effort, collection system modeling was performed by <br />updating the MWIvIC MOUSE hydraulic model developed for the W~WFMP to provide an <br />estimate of WWPH flows to be used in the analysis of wastewater treatment alternatives <br />and pumping capacity. A detailed report of the wastewater collection system hydraulic <br />modeling analysis is given in the March 2004 "MWMC Wastewater Facility Plan--Wet <br />Weather Peak Flow Analysis" technical memorandum (see appendix). The most significant <br />tasks in the modeling update process were the following: <br /> <br />1. Conversion of the wet weather flow estimating method from a spreadsheet-based <br /> regression analysis to the new RDII modeling module that is a part of the MOUSE <br /> model <br /> <br />2. Calibration of the model based on more recent system flow monitoring data <br /> <br />3. Use of a new planning time frame (2025) not addressed in the WWFMP <br /> <br />The WWFMP did not explicitly evaluate peak flows for 2025, although it did evaluate <br />buildout flows. Current modeling efforts were also undertaken, using the limited additional <br />flow monitoring data (from six permanent monitoring locations), to assess the effectiveness <br />of ongoing RDII reductSon efforts. Lrt addition, the current modeling effort has incorporated <br />system network configuratSon modifications, such as physical upgrades to pump stations <br />and/or pipelines. <br /> <br /> In accordance with DEQ guidelines, the 10-year summer and the 5-year winter rainfall <br /> events were compared to determine which storm produced the defining (worst case) flow <br /> condition in the wastewater collection system. The 10-year, 24-hour storm event produced <br /> an unadjusted peak flow at the *vVPCF of 181 mgd for the 2025 condition, far less than the <br /> 277 mgd for the 5-year event. Therefore, the 5-year rainfall event was used as the design <br /> rainfall event. <br /> <br /> The 2003-04 modeling effort indicated that WWPH flows generated in the collection system <br /> were comparable to those projected in the WWFMP. The best current estimate of <br /> 2025 WWPH flow at the WI>CF is 277 mgd. The buildout flow rate at the WPCF is 294 mgd. <br /> Based on these values and the 290 mgd peak buildout flow rate predicted in the WWFMP, a <br /> value of 300 mgd as the 2025 peak flow rate was used in evaluating peak flow management <br /> alternatives under the overall facility plarming effort, to account for the uncertainty <br /> associated with projecting flows 20 years into the future. The peak flow irt 2025 (based on <br /> the 5-year, 24-hour storm) that MWMC will control and manage for, however, is 277 mgd. <br /> <br /> 5-26 NIWMC_5 <br /> <br /> <br />