My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 20437
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
2009 No. 20426-20449
>
Ordinance No. 20437
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2012 1:36:52 PM
Creation date
10/14/2009 9:30:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Ordinances
CMO_Document_Number
20437
Document_Title
Ordinance on Coordinated Population (Metro Plan Amendment)
Adopted_Date
10/12/2009
Approved Date
10/13/2009
CMO_Effective_Date
11/13/2009
Signer
Kitty Piercy
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT 3 <br />DRAFT <br />Ms.- : Arles closed the public hearing for Lane County. <br />Mr. Carroll closed the public hearing for the City of Eugene. Ile asked if there was a reason to keep <br />the record open. <br />Mr. Mott saw no legal reason to keep the record open if commissioners needed no additional infor- <br />mation. <br />Mr. Mott addressed the concerns raised by Mr. Farthing. <br />Question: What happened if the cities of Eugene and Springfield did' not complete the requirement <br />forH.B.3337? <br />Answer: Ms. Jerome responded the statute did not specific a remedy so it would be the standard <br />remedy under the law, which staff believed would be for someone to file a writ in Circuit Court <br />to make the cities comply. She added that everyone was on track to complete the work and staff <br />had every reason to believe both jurisdictions would comply with H.B. 3337 within the time- <br />frame. <br />Question: What did the term `urban transition area" mean? <br />Answer. Referring to the handout.cntitled Existing Proposed Plan Text, Mr. Mott explained <br />staff was `recommending the tables included in the handout with figures for each of the years be- <br />tweea 2030 and 2035 to facilitate the completion of these projects without need to make addi- <br />tional amendments to the Metro Plan text", as noted on the handout. He noted the term Metro <br />Urban Area was used on the handout rather'than Urban Transition Area, Metro Urban Area re- <br />feaed to the area between a land area between the city limits and the UGB. PSU had developed <br />population figures for the Metro Urban Areas. Staff was proposing that the term Urban Transi- <br />tion Area be replaced with the term Metro Urban Area. <br />I& Howe explained that there was a TransPlan RTP requirement that would be off by five years. <br />Thus, the contract with PSU covered an additional five years. <br />Question: What did "In the event that either city needs to provide a forecast for a planning period <br />that begins after 2010, that city shall determine the 20 year forecast by adding 20 percent of the <br />2030 -2035 total population increment for each year beyond 2030" refer to? <br />Answer: Mr. Mohexplained the 20 percent solution referred to "c text "In the event that ei- <br />ther city needs to provide a forecast for it planning period that begins after 2010 that city shall <br />determine the 20 year forecast by adding 20 percent of the 2030 -2035 total population incre- <br />ment for each year beyond 2030" referred to the mathematical formula representing five years, <br />and allocating 20 percent to each ofthe years Although PSU would have addressed the ma- <br />thematics differently, the 20 percent solution proposed by staff was reasonable. <br />Question What caused the change is the Metro Plan population figure of 286,0007 <br />MINUTES —Joint Planning Commissions — September 1, 2009 Page 6 <br />City of Eugene, City of Springfield, Jane County <br />ATTACHMENT ° DRAFT <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).