My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 1: Ordinances on Infill Compatibility Standards Code Amendments
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2009
>
CC Agenda - 11/16/09 Public Hearing
>
Item 1: Ordinances on Infill Compatibility Standards Code Amendments
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:18:24 PM
Creation date
11/13/2009 9:40:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
11/16/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
172
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Tandem parking is where two motor vehicles park nose-to-end in tandem. The first motor <br />vehicle does not have independent access, and the second motor vehicle must move to provide <br />access to the first motor vehicle. Currently, EC 9.6410 on Motor Vehicle Parking Standards does <br />not recognize tandem parking. The appropriate use of tandem parking directly off alleys could be <br />used to more efficiently provide a minimum number of required off-street parking spaces. For a <br />unit with three or more bedrooms, the tenants sharing the dwelling unit can make arrangements <br />to move vehicles when necessary. So a tandem parking space should only be allowed to meet the <br />minimum off-street parking requirements for each unit with 3 or more bedrooms. The depth of a <br />tandem parking space should be such that a compact and a regular vehicle can park in the space <br />without having to protrude into the alley. Tandem parking should be restricted so that it does not <br />impose on the street face and frontage of a parcel, placing more parking on the street. The goal is <br />that building (eyes to the street) not parking be located at the ground floor on the street frontage. <br />So tandem parking should not be allowed a minimum distance from the public street right-of- <br />way. <br />An additional problem with off-street parking occurs on alleys of 15 feet width or less <br />Off-street parking perpendicular (90 degrees) and directly off the alley can result in vehicles <br />protruding into the alley. As infill increases, adjacent alleys become more heavily used by <br />pedestrians, bicyclists, residents for access, and service vehicles. It is also important that alleys <br />are clear for fire and other emergency vehicles for safety. An alley width of 20 feet is normally <br />considered the turn out space required for backing out of a parking space. With an alley of 14' <br />feet in width, this can be a problem if there is a fence, building, or alley parking located across <br />the alley from the alley parking. If the equivalent of a 3-foot backout space was required for alley <br />parking, this would help resolve this issue. Many multifamily developments already provide an <br />equivalent backout space for alley parking. <br />Off-street parking can also be leased from nearby multifamily or commercial developments that <br />have excess parking. However, clear and objective criteria for code compliance of leased parking <br />is not fully specified in the current code. There is also an inability to enforce any leased parking <br />agreements, since the leased parking spaces are not currented marked or signed. <br />Background Information and Current Code on Off-Street Parking Criteria <br />Tandem parking off an alley is not currently recognized as a method to meet the minimum off- <br />street parking requirements for multifamily development. Some recent developments have <br />provided tandem parking, but the Eugene land use code does not recognize these as parking <br />spaces when calculating off-street parking provided. <br />In the past, Eugene code administration used to require a backup or backout space buffer when <br />off-street parking is provided directly off an alley. This no longer is the case. The code <br />requirements in EC 9.6410 on Motor Vehicle Parking Standards do not specify any special <br />criteria for off-street parking directly off an alley. <br />Expected Outcomes of Changes to Off-Street Parking Criteria <br />Multifamily developments will be better able to provide adequate off-street parking directly off <br />of alleys in R-3 and R-4 zones. The changes proposed do not affect the densities that can be <br />achieved. The off-street parking provided on alleys will not result in vehicles protruding into the <br />Multi-Dwelling Infill Committee Parking Recommendations - April 6, 2009 Page <br />7 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.