My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 7: Action: Ordinance on Infill Compatibility Standards Code Amendments
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2009
>
CC Agenda - 12/14/09 - City Council Meeting and Meeting of the Eugene Urban Renewal Agency
>
Item 7: Action: Ordinance on Infill Compatibility Standards Code Amendments
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:55:10 PM
Creation date
12/11/2009 10:55:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
12/14/2009
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
439
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
proposed agreement. The city’s role would be to review and approve the initial agreement, and <br />perform ongoing enforcement on a complaint basis (see explanation of enforcement procedures <br />under question 3 below). <br /> <br />A revised version of the car-sharing code language option is attached. Revisions to subsection 2 <br />make it more clear what is required of the applicant. If included in the ordinance, this parking space <br />credit would provide an incentive for a developer to try car-sharing as a transportation strategy. It <br />should be noted however, that the ability to reduce the number of parking spaces by up to 50% <br />already exists in the code for developments that propose a Transportation Demand Management <br />(TDM) plan. Car sharing could be a strategy employed by a TDM plan; however, TDM plans are <br />typically submitted by large organizations as opposed to individual developments, as they require a <br />Traffic Impact Analysis to be prepared by an engineer and approved through a Type II (Planning <br />Director decision) land use approval process. <br /> <br /> <br />2.Would students get reduced rent, or paid membership, for joining a car-share? Are <br />there examples of cities similar in size to Eugene, with a large university, using car- <br />sharing? <br /> <br />In the Eugene Rentals example, residents of Alder Commons are receiving paid memberships as a <br />benefit of living there. Other examples of car-sharing programs on university campuses include <br />Portland State and Linfield College in McMinnville. In addition, Ashland Car Share was launched <br />this summer, and numerous cities in Canada (Victoria, Vancouver, Toronto), along with every major <br />US city, have growing car-sharing programs. <br /> <br />Austin Car Share is a non-profit organization serving multiple markets in Austin, Texas. In the <br />University Neighborhood Overlay district, developers providing shared cars are eligible for a 40% <br />reduction in required parking spaces. The vehicles may also park at city parking meters free of <br />charge. More information about Austin Car Share can be found at http://www.austincarshare.org/. <br /> <br /> <br />3.Can car-sharing be tied to membership, as a performance measure? How will the city <br />enforce the requirements if an agreement lapses? Will the neighbors have to find out <br />about it and report it? More broadly, is ICS proposing a different approach to <br />enforcement, which is currently challenging and complaint driven? <br /> <br />Because the terms of agreements and contracts vary widely from city to city and from one car <br />sharing organization to another, most municipalities require the developer to demonstrate how the <br />program will be administered . The proposed draft language for Eugene requires the developer to <br />demonstrate how the program will be administered by requiring submittal and recording of the <br />agreement between the developer or property manager and a professional car-sharing organization. <br />Once the agreement is recorded, it is the property owner’s responsibility to adhere to the <br />requirements within it. Currently, agreements such as those for car-sharing are enforced on a <br />complaint-basis. If the car ceases to be parked in its parking place, for example, a complaint would <br />be investigated and appropriate follow up action taken. In such a case, the city would require the <br />owner to come into parking compliance and would assist in outlining options for doing so. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.