Laserfiche WebLink
bills regarding metal theft and bills related to property transfer and a vehicle registration fee, should be <br />reintroduced. Ms. Wilson noted that one of the five bills related to metal theft had passed and that the rest <br />of those bills had been rolled onto the bill that had passed, so that as a concept, metal theft had passed. <br />Mayor Piercy remarked that it was important that the CCIGR work on prioritizing and letting the <br />legislators know what the area’s priorities were. She said they should also consider issues of importance to <br />the region. She noted that there was an interest on the part of PeaceHealth, working with the Oregon <br />Health and Sciences University (OHSU), in having a “medical translation center” at the University of <br />Oregon. <br />3. Upcoming Special Session <br />Ms. Wilson reviewed bill concepts that were already in draft or were being drafted, listed in the attachment <br />2010 Special Legislative Session Proposed Bills <br />entitled. She explained that the first bill sought to fix the <br />transportation package in House Bill (HB) 2001.She had assumed that the CCIGR would support this <br />concept as one section would correct an oversight of the fee increases not being tied to the 50/30/20 split. <br />Ms. Wilson explained that BM 66 and BM 67 would increase corporate income taxes and tax rates of those <br />in the highest income brackets among other things. She noted that the special ballot was scheduled for <br />January and if the two measures did not pass the Legislature would have to come up with another way to <br />address the deficit. <br />Ms. Wilson stated that the 911 system and the fund associated with it, which came from 75 cents people <br />were charged on all phone bills, had been “raided” in the last session. She related that some advice from <br />the attorney general had stated that if the funds dedicated for 911 were raided and used for other purposes, <br />Oregon would be prohibited from receiving federal funds for 911 services. She said the issue would be <br />taken up in order to protect the fund. Staff had recommended the CCIGR support any measures in that <br />regard. <br />Continuing, Ms. Wilson reviewed the proposed bill regarding public safety on campus. She said the bill <br />had been brought about because of the Roseburg teacher’s experience in trying to protect herself from an <br />abusive spouse but not being able to carry a concealed weapon on campus. She related that the Oregon <br />University System (OUS) disallowed carrying concealed weapons on state university campus grounds. <br />She said gun rights advocates had filed a lawsuit against the OUS maintaining that it was a violation of <br />constitutional rights. She added that there was also a separate lawsuit related to someone in a similar <br />situation to that of the Roseburg teacher, with the issue there on whether an employee could deny the right <br />to carry a gun. She stated that the Governor had asked for some support and advice and Senator Floyd <br />Prozanski had set up a working group to discuss the issue over the interim in order to come back with <br />some recommendations regarding how to address this particular situation. She noted that the City of <br />Seattle had adopted an ordinance prohibiting weapons in all parks and in certain recreational facilities. <br />Ms. Wilson reported that it appeared that the Legislature would attempt to override the Governor’s veto on <br />the Business Energy Tax Credit (BETC) cap in February. She noted that the City had remained neutral on <br />the cap because it was so large it would not affect any local projects nor would it affect projects underta- <br />ken by the Eugene Water & Electric Board (EWEB). She said part of the discussion in the drafting of the <br />bill had been regarding the pass-through, which Eugene intended to use as part of the funding for projects <br />being funded by stimulus money. She said the City could not use the credit but could use it as an incentive <br />to gain other project partners that could take advantage of the tax credit. She stated that if the pass-through <br />was threatened, staff would recommend opposition to any restrictions on cities using it for the BETC. <br />MINUTES—Council Committee on Intergovernmental Relations October 21, 2009 Page 2 <br />