Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT A <br />consolidation, producing significant savings. The total personnel cost avoidance at full imple- <br />mentation is forecast at $851,275. Future savings realized through streamlined support opera- <br />tions, sharing of best practices, and economies of scale would add to that number. <br />The consultants’ report and recommendations were initially presented to you in June. There was <br />a follow-up discussion in September, which prompted this additional analysis. <br /> <br />Timeline and Initial Steps of Functional Consolidation <br /> <br />The timeline and steps for Phase I (January 1 – June 30, 2010) are as follows: <br /> <br /> <br />1.Planning (January 1 – February 28) <br />? <br /> <br />Site visits to model merged fire department systems in Oregon and California for <br />elected officials, major stakeholders, and staff <br />? <br /> <br />Preparations and moving to co-locate combined staff by functional area <br />? <br /> <br />Develop preliminary assumptions for FY 11 combined budget <br /> <br /> <br />2.Implementation (March 1 – May 31) <br />? <br /> <br />Initiate Joint Services <br />? <br /> <br />Make adjustments as needed <br />? <br /> <br />Prepare details for proposed combined budget <br />? <br /> <br />Recommend Phase II strategy to proceed or discontinue process <br />? <br /> <br />Seek recommendation of labor unions to proceed or discontinue <br /> <br /> <br />3.Evaluation/Recommendation (March 1 – June 30) <br />? <br /> <br />Complete evaluation of all elements of combined services <br />? <br /> <br />Make recommendation to city councils <br /> <br />Creating an accurate and detailed timeline with steps for Phase II in FY 11 and beyond is directly <br />dependent on the nature and timing of decisions that are yet to be made and is considered by staff <br />not to be feasible at this time. In any initiative of this type, not all questions can be answered in <br />advance. Foremost among these, and raising additional questions of their own, are the possible <br />longer-term options for providing the service. Those could include re-separation of the depart- <br />ments, continued consolidation under some form of joint governance board, formation of or an- <br />nexation to a special district, or others. Future decisions will require future solutions. <br /> <br /> <br />Baseline Assumption for Estimating Savings and Service Level Impacts FY 11 and beyond <br /> <br />The only highly reliable information available for estimating savings is to use the FY 10 adopted <br />budget for both departments and apply the first year savings from positions that will be held va- <br />cant if a consolidation plan is approved. In the first year, $629,988 savings would result from <br />vacancies and in the second year, $851,275. These figures are given in Attachment 2. (Note: Of <br />the $629,988, Eugene Fire has already reduced their FY10 budget appropriation by $125,000.) <br /> <br /> <br />2 <br />ATTACHMENT 1 <br /> <br />