My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution No. 3716
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Resolutions
>
pre 1996 Resolutions
>
Resolution No. 3716
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2012 10:33:21 AM
Creation date
1/19/2010 9:54:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Resolutions
Document_Date
9/13/1982
Document_Number
Resolution No. 3716
CMO_Effective_Date
9/13/1982
Author
Karen Soldman
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3 7/6 <br />o <br />13 . Propos 4, page 8 (which will be new proposal #5) should be revised to <br />read: "[The present efforts by] The Eugene Parks Department should continue its <br />efforts to acquire [ a five-acre] additional ark land for the park site north of <br />Barger Avenue between Be l t l i ne Road and Highway 99 North." <br />14. Proposal 7, page 8 (new proposal 8) will be corrected to read: "Effective <br />screening, berms, or landscaping should be provided along all arterials-- <br />Bel tl i ne Road, Barger Avenue, and Highway 99 North--in an effort to minimize <br />exi sting and future negative impacts [existing and future] from these arterials.'" <br />..III .I _ <br />15. Proposal 8, page 10 (new Proposal 9) will be corrected to read: "A profile <br />. of . . [must] should be considered." <br />16, Proposal 13, page 10 will be corrected to read: "Based on the . site <br />review procedures [are] should provide an adequate o il <br />17. Revise Policy, page 12 to read: "A residential node [should] shall be <br />developed . . ."" _ <br />18. on page 12, revise proposal 1 to read: "[Require] Site review procedures <br />should be requi for the commercial portion . . . and planned unit development <br />proce ures required for the residential portion of the node, <br />19. on page 12, revise proposal 2 to read: "[Provide] Adequate and safe auto- - <br />m o b i l e ingress and egress from Royal Avenue and D anebo Avenue should_ be provided <br />taking into consideration the possibi lty of a future Royal- -Beltl ine bypass. � <br />20. on page 12, revise proposal 3 to read.: "[Provide] Safe and adequate <br />pedestrian -- and bicycle -- oriented access should be provided between the commer- <br />cial portion of the development node . . in the immediate <br />mme i ate and general area <br />north of Royal Avenue." <br />21. On page 12, revise proposal 4 to read: " [Provide] An adequate transition <br />from density in building height should be provided between low-density <br />residential development." <br />22. on page 12, revise proposal 5 to read* "[Do not allow in the development] <br />Through access should not be allowed in the devel which will circumvent <br />the intersection of Royal Avenue and Danebo Avenue." <br />23, on page 14, paragraph 1, revise the text to read: " [ It is the intent that] <br />A floating node [like other nodes will] is intended to reflect the energy and <br />transportation [ p o l i c y ] o f i c i es [intent of the Metropolitan Area General Plan <br />. and proposed res i dent i a rev e l opment . " <br />24, on page 15, correct paragraph 2 as follows: "In evaluating the floating <br />node [considered] two other locations were considered;" <br />25. On pages 15 to 17, revise the policy statement to read; "When develop- <br />ment patterns indicate the need for an additional commercial/residential node <br />it [should] shall be located . . . residential . 11 <br />1911 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.