Laserfiche WebLink
Policy lssues <br />There are no council policies in place related to naming city-owned facilities at the present time. The <br />primary issue is to determine if there should be a unified policy for naming, and if so, whether there <br />should be parameters related to naming in recognition and naming in commemoration. <br /> <br />Council Goals <br />There is no current council goal related to this matter. <br /> <br />Financial and/or Resource Considerations <br />At this time, this is a discussion of issues and possible options. Should the council decide to implement <br />a policy and procedure to suggest names for facilities, there may be resource requirements. <br /> <br />Other Background Information <br />The community abounds with city-owned facilities named within all three major categories of naming <br />opportunities: 1) people, 2) places, and 3) themes. In the "people" category are the Hult Center, the <br />Jacobs Gallery, the Silva Concert Hall, the Celeste Campbell Senior Center, Alton Baker Park, and <br />Mahlon Sweet Field. Facilities named after places or locations include Amazon Community Center, <br />Sheldon Community Center, Whitaker Public Safety Station, Bethel Public Safety Station and <br />Washington Park. In the theme category are the Peterson Barn Community Center, the States Ballfield, <br />Whilamut Natural Area, the Atrium Building, and many streets in the city such as those named after <br />trees, flowers and other fauna. <br /> <br />Most of the internal city-facility conference rooms have been named in similar manner. For example, <br />conference rooms in the Atrium Building, Public Works Building, and the Hult Center have been named <br />in honor of long-term city employees who are now deceased. Conference rooms on the 4th floor of the <br />library have been named using a "rocks and gemstones of Oregon" theme. There one will find <br />conference rooms such as Agate, Obsidian, Sunstone and Quartz. Other conference rooms have been <br />named by geographical landmarks or location, such as the East Wing Conference Room or the Activity <br />Room. <br /> <br />In addition, for internally used facilities there is another division in naming that should be considered. <br />For lack of better terms, these are "naming in recognition" and "naming in commemoration." <br /> <br />"Naming in recognition" refers to the practices previously noted by the Library and the Parks and Open <br />Space Division; that is, naming to recognize monetary gifts. Both groups have been successful in <br />offering naming opportunities for donations and sponsorship to facilities. The Library offered named <br />gift opportunities ranging from gifts of $1,000,000 to $100. The Parks and Open Space draft document <br />offers naming recognition ranging from newly acquired parkland and park amenities to sponsorship of <br />park events. <br /> <br />"Naming in commemoration" refers to the practice of naming a city facility after a person who has made <br />substantial contributions to the United States, Oregon or the community without any monetary gift to the <br />city itself. Examples of this are the Knickerbocker Bridge, Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard, and <br />streets named after U.S. Presidents. <br /> <br />This second category, that is, naming in commemoration, is the process for which there is little policy or <br />procedure, and the one for which there tends to be the most controversy. This is the area which would <br />benefit from a more detailed and thoughtful process. Contacts with other cities and Internet research <br /> <br /> L:\CMO\2004 Council Agendas\M040712\S040712B.DOC <br /> <br /> <br />