Laserfiche WebLink
show that a number of cities have such policies in place. These provide a good basis for developing a <br />policy for city-owned facilities. <br /> <br />With the construction of two new elementary schools, Eugene School District 4-J recently adopted a <br />formal policy related to naming of school buildings. That policy is as follows: <br /> "The board will select names of schools in the district in which the students and parents may take <br /> pride. Personal prejudice or favoritism, political pressure and current fashion shall not influence <br /> the selection process. The following categories are suggested: <br /> People: Names of distinguished men or women who have made outstanding contributions to the <br /> community, state, nation or general welfare of humanity, in the fields of arts and letters, science, <br /> government or education. Names of people still active in their careers are not acceptable. <br /> Places: Names of recognized historical and geological landmarks or areas; geographic <br /> subdivisions or points of interest. <br /> Themes: Thematic names which reflect the character of the community, culturally and <br /> historically, or which identify it by reference to indigenous and characteristic flora and fauna." <br /> <br />Another consideration regarding a naming policy is that of naming and renaming. Naming of a new <br />facility or amenity may be easier than renaming an existing facility. Renaming may require additional <br />resources if it is a building or street. <br /> <br />One final matter to consider in creating a naming policy is that of public involvement. Some cities have <br />created ad hoc groups to develop a set of names, others have created an initiative-type system and still <br />others have handed off such tasks to a standing citizen advisory committee. There are a number of <br />variations related to citizen involvement. <br /> <br />Timing <br />This item is not time-sensitive. <br /> <br />OPTIONS <br />The City Council has several options with regard to a naming policy: <br />1. Maintain the status quo. This would be the least costly and easiest course, but would not provide any <br /> uniform guidelines or direction for staff or the community. <br />2. Direct the City Manager to prepare a proposed policy roughly based upon existing policies in other <br /> cities. This option would enable the council to a good idea of what a policy would and would not <br /> include and would require a minimum of resources. <br />3. Leave intact the current "naming in recognition" practices of the Library and Parks and Open Space <br /> Division and direct the City Manager to prepare a policy that relates only to "naming in <br /> commemoration," again based upon existing guidelines from other cities. <br />4. Adopt the naming policy and procedures of one of the several example cities. <br /> <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br />Staff recommends that the City Council direct the City Manager to develop a policy related to "naming <br />in commemoration" and that a draft proposal be presented to the City Council within the next 90 days. <br />The current practices of the Library and Parks and Open Space Division are successful and approach <br />naming from a very different perspective; there is not a great deal of need to revise these practices. <br /> <br /> L:\CMO\2004 Council Agendas\M040712\S040712B.DOC <br /> <br /> <br />