Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The subject property was not included in the RLS supply analysis. (See Exhibit I of the applicant’s <br />written statement). The applicant’s written statement, which is included here by reference, notes <br />that both the RLS and Willow Creek Special Area Study do not allocate the subject property for <br />residential land supply. As such, a change to the residential designation from parks and open space <br />will only add to the residential inventory and can be made to the subject property without <br />affecting other inventories. <br /> <br />Based on these findings, the proposal is consistent with Statewide Planning Goal 10. <br /> <br />Goal 11 - Public Facilities and Services: To plan and develop a timely, orderly and efficient <br />arrangement of public facilities and services to serve as a framework for urban and rural <br />development. <br /> <br />The area affected by the amendments is located inside the City limits. The existing level of public <br />facilities and service is adequate to serve the needs of existing and future development. However, <br />specific design details related to public improvements such as stormwater remain to be resolved in <br />the context of any future development proposal. The provision of these amendments does not <br />significantly affect the planning or development of future public facilities or services. Therefore, <br />the amendments are consistent with Statewide Planning Goal 11. <br /> <br />Goal 12 - Transportation: To provide and encourage a safe, convenient and economic <br />transportation system. <br /> <br />Goal 12 is implemented through the Transportation Planning Rule (TPR), as defined in Oregon <br />Administrative Rule OAR 660-012-0000, et seq. The Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area <br />Transportation Plan (TransPlan) provides the regional policy framework through which the TPR is <br />implemented at the local level. The TPR states that when land use changes, including amendments <br />to acknowledged comprehensive plans, significantly affect an existing or planned transportation <br />facility, the local government must put in place measures to assure that the allowed land uses are <br />consistent with the function, capacity and performance standards of those transportation <br />facilities. <br /> <br />Pursuant to OAR 660-012-0060(1), the TPR requires a determination of which existing and planned <br />transportation facilities will experience a significant effect as a result of a proposed amendment, <br />and defines what constitutes a significant effect. One way in which an amendment will significantly <br />affect an existing or planned transportation facility is, if at the end of the planning period, the <br />amendment will reduce the performance of a transportation facility below the minimum <br />acceptable performance standard or will worsen the performance of a transportation facility that <br />is otherwise projected to perform below the minimum acceptable performance standard (OAR <br />660-012-0060(1)(c)(B) and (C)). <br /> <br />The end of the planning period as identified in the adopted transportation system plan (TransPlan) <br />is 2015. For state facilities, Oregon Highway Plan (OHP) Policy 1F.2 states in part: “When <br />evaluating highway mobility for amendments to transportation system plans, acknowledged <br />Findings – Lane Memorial Gardens (MA 08-1and Z 09-1) Page 7 <br /> <br />