My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2010
>
CC Agenda - 05/24/10 Meeting
>
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:30:13 PM
Creation date
5/21/2010 12:33:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
5/24/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
th <br />Dennis Gabrielson <br />, 300 South 10 Street, Creswell, objected to the mandated furloughs imposed by the City on <br />its AFSCME employees and predicted they would be found unlawful. He objected to the expenditure of funding <br />on the Beam project at a difficult economic time and suggested that the council stop considering federal money <br />to be free money. Mr. Gabrielson also noted his objection to the Dream Act. He did not think that illegal <br />immigrants should be given special treatment. He indicated his concurrence with the remarks of Ms. Clarke <br />about the firm that maintained the library, saying it also maintained the wastewater facility and many people did <br />not feel it did a good job. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy closed the public forum. She noted her own concerns about contracting City services as a policy <br />and was also concerned about the relationship between the City and its unions. She had sought direction from <br />the City Attorney about the degree to which the council could become involved in the issue and was waiting to <br />hear back. She thanked the Sustainability Commission for sharing its concerns and noted that she had sent an e- <br />mail to the council that afternoon about the same issue. She acknowledged the gap in preservation funding but <br />questioned if the council wanted to restrict STP funds by policy to that use. <br /> <br />Councilor Poling asked how many people were laid off as a result of the library contract. City Manager Jon <br />Ruiz indicated no City employees were laid off. Councilor Poling asked about the training provided to contract <br />employees. City Manager Ruiz said he would get back to the council on that issue. Councilor Poling suggested <br />that if the work was substandard, that was not what the City was looking for. He asked what impacts on other <br />service areas or employees were involved in the reduction. City Manager Ruiz indicated that the City’s goal <br />was to minimize the impact of such reductions on services and avoid layoffs. He said that the City succeeded in <br />that goal. He did not know what other options had existed and did not want to speculate. <br /> <br />Councilor Poling asked about the new manager position at the library. City Manager Ruiz explained that the <br />City combined two positions into one position and retitled it. <br /> <br />Councilor Clark asked if City Manager Ruiz considered the contract a change in policy. City Manager Ruiz <br />indicated that the occasion was the first time it occurred in his knowledge. Responding to a question from <br />Councilor Clark about the actual savings realized by contracting maintenance services at the library, City <br />Manager Ruiz estimated the savings at $250,000 annually, and indicated that $100,000 had been saved in fiscal <br />year 2010. Councilor Clark asked how much the contracted employees were paid, and if City Manager Ruiz <br />would characterize it as a “non-living wage.” City Manager Ruiz acknowledged the hourly rate was less and <br />indicated he would have to return with a comparison. <br /> <br />City Manager Ruiz expressed appreciation for the work of City employees and for AFSCME’s representatives, <br />and suggested that parties shared different viewpoints. He wanted to work on the relationship and thought the <br />city had an opportunity to improve things and said “we will.” His motivation for the change was to ensure that <br />all employees could remain employed with the organization. He believed that conflicting values were at work <br />and said the City needed to work through those. <br /> <br />Speaking to the concerns expressed by Mr. Sabin and Mr. Oberman, Councilor Clark asked if some houses <br />lacked on-street parking entirely. Planning and Development Director Susan Muir did not think so, and <br />indicated she would follow up. She said she also planned to meet with Mr. Savin and Mr. Oberman to see if <br />there was a “win-win” situation that could be found. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy adjusted the agenda to accommodate the schedule of Councilor Ortiz. <br /> <br />5. ACTION: <br />Interim Appointment to the Budget Committee <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—City Council January 11, 2010 Page 3 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.