Laserfiche WebLink
development, that it would provide important historic context for the Walnut Street Station, and that it could be <br />part of a signature entrance to Eugene. <br /> <br />Rick Henson <br />, 317 South F Street, Springfield, AFSCME Local 1724, noted the City’s decision to contract out <br />ten maintenance jobs at the Eugene Library, and said AFSCME believed it was a bad decision with a long-term <br />negative impact on the community. He suggested the community looked to City for leadership in creating <br />family-wage jobs. He asked the council to reverse the decision and restore the jobs. Mr. Henson also expressed <br />concern about the relationship between the City and its unions and suggested the City did not partner in good <br />faith given its tendency to act unilaterally, sometimes in violation of contracts. He said AFSCME had <br />volunteered to collaborate with the City and would continue to do so to get the situation back on track, which <br />was important for the future of the relationship when economic times improved. <br /> <br />Lou Sinniger <br />, 25416 Irene Street, Veneta, a former AFSCME 1724 representative, provided some background <br />on the negotiations that occurred between the City and AFSCME in 2005-2006 in regard to contracting out <br />services under former City Manager Dennis Taylor, which resulted in the development and mutual adoption of a <br />competitive service assessment tool to determine whether contracting was appropriate. City Manager Taylor <br />had endorsed the tool. Mr. Sinniger said the City did not use the tool when it decided to contract out services at <br />the library, which surprised him after all the work that had gone into it. <br /> <br />Cindy Clark <br />, 1620 Coburg Court, represented AFSCME Local 1724. She expressed concern about the <br />relationship between AFSCME and the City and asked the council if the decision was consistent with its goals <br />and the community’s values. She asked how eliminating ten family-wage jobs and replacing them with <br />minimum-wage jobs met the council’s goals. While she applauded the fact the contracting firm hired disabled <br />individuals and veterans, and noted the City did the same, she also questioned how hiring a disabled person at a <br />lower wage than other people doing the same work fit the council’s goals and the organization’s diversity goals. <br />She asked if it was prudent to risk the asset represented by the library to a firm that was not doing a good job at <br />the other facility it maintained, the Atrium , and asked how much it would cost to restore the library when the <br />damage was done. Ms. Clark also questioned the City’s expenditure on a new City Attorney and management <br />positions in a number of areas at the same time it was reducing family-wage jobs. <br /> <br />Josh Skov <br />, 2036 Willamette Street, a member of the Sustainability Committee, discussed the City’s use of <br />federal Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds and recommended that they be prioritized for bicycle and <br />pedestrian investments. He suggested the use of money for transportation other than those purposes was at odds <br />with other council goals. Mr. Skov recommended that the council direct staff to favor bicycle and pedestrian <br />investments in its lobbying for federal funding, direct staff to “level the playing field” in terms of alternative <br />modes planning, and to direct staff to seek “win-win” investments that benefit the automobile as a “side effect” <br />of pedestrian- and bicycle-related projects. <br /> <br />Vic Sabin <br />, 1895 Columbia Street, objected to the fact that a City employee installed signs for university permit <br />parking along his street without notice to residents. He acknowledged the University of Oregon owned many of <br />th <br />the properties along the street, but there were private houses bordering East 19 Avenue, so he had felt relatively <br />secure until he saw the signs. He had submitted photographs of the signage to the council and questioned its <br />logic. He pointed out that such restrictions were worse for families with children, and for families without direct <br />access to Columbia and Moss streets. He asked that the signs be taken down from the front of privately owned <br />property. <br /> <br />Mel Oberman <br />, 1895 Columbia Street, shared Mr. Sabin’s objections to the signage installed by the City of <br />Eugene. He said that the situation would be made worse by new apartment construction that would displace <br />existing parking. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—City Council January 11, 2010 Page 2 <br /> <br />