My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2010
>
CC Agenda - 05/24/10 Meeting
>
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:30:13 PM
Creation date
5/21/2010 12:33:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
5/24/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
urban renewal and thought the detail provided had been useful. He determined from Ms. Medary that the webcasts <br />as well as written minutes were archived. <br /> <br />Mr. Poling commended the summaries prepared by Council Coordinator Beth Forrest, to which he frequently <br />referred. However, he also referred to the minutes of other groups, particularly when the council was considering a <br />recommendation from an advisory group. He liked having hard copy minutes and thought they were a valuable tool. <br />Ms. Solomon was unsure of her position, and asked if the City could broadcast more meetings, such as Police <br />Commission and Housing Policy Board meetings, over the Web. Ms. Medary indicated she would look into that. <br />Ms. Solomon determined from Ms. Medary that the issue was raised in part due to resource concerns. Ms. Solomon <br />thought it was important to consider transparency when talking about meeting minutes. She expressed concern about <br />spending more in one area to save in another area. <br /> <br />Mr. Pryor suggested that the minutes needed to be in a format that could be preserved, and paper was not the perfect <br />format for that. He suggested that something on CD could be updated to a new technology. He agreed that access <br />was another issue. He said he preferred a summary approach; if he wanted to know more, he could go back to the <br />video recording. He believed that the actual broadcast would provide a better sense of legislative intent than written <br />minutes. Ms. Taylor was also unsure of her position. She was not ready to say that minutes were not needed. She <br />pointed out that not all citizens had access to computer technology. She was not ready to fire the minutes recorders <br />yet. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy suggested that the issue did not concern the council only; she believed that the public had an interest in <br />the subject as well. She did not want to make a determination without giving the community an opportunity to weigh <br />in. <br /> <br />Mr. Clark invited the input of minutes-recording staff. <br /> <br />Mr. Zelenka suggested the minutes recorders would have a new job annotating the webcasts. He said his suggestion <br />would only work for those meetings on webcasts, while other meetings would still have minutes recorders unless the <br />City held more meetings in rooms that were wired for webcasting. That was also a resource issue. <br /> <br />Ms. Ortiz concurred with the remarks of Mayor Piercy. She said that she sometimes had a difficult time <br />understanding those offering public comment, and often relied on the minutes for that information. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy adjourned the work session at 7:25 p.m. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Jon Ruiz, <br />City Manager <br /> <br />(Recorded by Kimberly Young) <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—City Council October 12, 2009 Page 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.