My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2C: Approval of Giudici Annexation (A 10-1)
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2010
>
CC Agenda - 05/24/10 Meeting
>
Item 2C: Approval of Giudici Annexation (A 10-1)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:32:40 PM
Creation date
5/21/2010 12:43:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
5/24/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT C <br /> <br /> <br />Planning Director's Recommendation and Findings <br />Giudici/Elms Annexation (City File A 10-1) <br /> <br />Application Submitted: February 16, 2010 <br />Property Owner/Applicant: Kirk Giudici and Jade Elms <br />Location: 195 Lindner Lane, northeast corner of Lindner Lane and Evergreen Drive, west of River Road <br />Assessor’s Map/ Tax Lot:17-04-13-33 Tax Lot 7100 <br />Zoning: R-1 Low Density Residential with /UL Urbanizable Land Overlay Zone <br />Lead City Staff: Alissa Hansen, Senior Planner, (541) 682-5508 <br />Related Permits/Applications: None <br /> <br />EVALULATION: <br />Based on the information provided by the applicant, the City has determined that this request complies with <br />Eugene Code (EC) Section 9.7805 Annexation - Applicability. As such, it is subject to review and approval in <br />accordance with the requirements, application criteria and procedures of EC 9.7800 through 9.7835. The <br />applicable approval criteria are presented below in bold typeface with findings and conclusions following <br />each. <br />EC 9.7825(1) The land proposed to be annexed is within the city’s urban growth boundary and is: <br /> (a) Contiguous to the city limits; or <br /> (b) Separated from the city only by a public right of way or a stream, bay, lake or other <br />body of water. <br />Complies Findings: The annexation area is within the City's urban growth boundary (UGB), and is <br />contiguous to the City limits, consistent with subsection (a). As shown on the applicant's <br />YES NO <br />map, the City limits are contiguous with the subject area of land along the eastern <br />boundary of the property. Additionally, the street abutting the subject property to the <br />south, Lindner Lane, is already annexed. <br /> <br />EC 9.7825(2) The proposed annexation is consistent with applicable policies in the Metro Plan and in <br />any applicable refinement plans. <br />Complies Findings: The proposed annexation area is within the urban growth boundary. Several <br />policies from the Metro Plan generally support this annexation by encouraging compact <br />YES NO <br />urban growth to achieve efficient use of land and urban service provisions within the <br />UGB, including the following: <br /> <br />C. Growth Management, Goals, Findings and Policies: <br />Policy 8. Land with the UGB may be converted from urbanizable to urban only through <br />annexation to a city when it is found that: <br /> a. A minimum level of key urban facilities and services can be provided to the area <br />in an orderly and efficient manner. <br /> b. There will be a logical area and time within which to deliver urban services and <br />facilities. Conversion of urbanizable land to urban shall also be consistent with the <br />Metro Plan. (page II-C-4) <br /> <br />Policy 10. Annexation to a city through normal processes shall continue to be the <br />highest priority. (page II-C-4). <br /> <br />Policy 16. Ultimately, land within the UGB shall be annexed to a city and provided with <br />the required minimum level of urban facilities and services. While the time frame for <br />annexation may vary, annexation should occur as land transitions from urbanizable to <br />urban. (page II-C-5) <br /> <br />Additionally, both the Metro Plan and the applicable refinement plan, the River <br />Road/Santa Clara Urban Facilities Plan designate the annexation area as appropriate for <br />Low Density Residential use. If the annexation is approved, per EC 9.7820(3), the <br />annexation area will remain zoned R-1 Low Density Residential, and the /UL overlay will <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.