Laserfiche WebLink
Proposed Projects <br />The three downtown projects are: 1) assistance to Lane Community College (LCC) for their project on <br />th <br />the 10 and Charnelton Development Site, 2) additional downtown urban renewal assistance in funding <br />the Broadway Place Garages so that the Garages remain available and in good condition to support other <br />development and redevelopment in downtown (and, at the same time, to enable improvements to public <br />safety downtown), and 3) infrastructure improvements to the Park Blocks to provide better opportunities <br />for the Farmers’ Market. The projects are described in more detail in Section 600 of the Plan and <br />Chapters 5 and 6 of the accompanying Report. (The Plan and Report are in Ordinance Exhibits A and <br />B, respectively, in Attachment A.) <br />Amendment Information <br />The Downtown Urban Renewal District was created in July 1968. The Plan has been amended four <br />times, most recently in 2004. Two of those amendments extended the life of the Downtown District, <br />and two of those amendments made other changes. The proposed Plan includes a summary of the past <br />amendments. State law requires a “substantial plan amendment” for council to increase the maximum <br />indebtedness or to increase the district boundary by more than 1%. The substantial amendment process <br />requires a mailed notification to all Eugene property owners; review by the Planning Commission; <br />notification to other impacted taxing districts; and a public hearing. The summary of plan amendment <br />process feedback is Attachment E. <br />Maximum Indebtedness <br />Maximum indebtedness refers to a total spending limit during the life of the plan. For Eugene, the <br />maximum indebtedness was adopted in 1998 and spending towards that limit began in fiscal year 1999. <br />The current “maximum indebtedness” of $33 million has almost been fully spent, with about $26 million <br />spent on the library. Adopting a “maximum indebtedness” figure does not authorize or obligate the <br />district to enter into debt. Rather, it allows current and future URA Boards to have the ability to fund <br />projects over time, either with cash or by issuing debt. The proposed ordinance would increase the <br />spending limit by $13.6 million. <br />Legislation passed in 2009 places new limits on how much a municipality can increase maximum <br />indebtedness. That same legislation, however, also provides that those limitations “do not apply to the <br />extent the municipality approving a plan obtains the written concurrence of taxing districts imposing at <br />least 75 percent of the amount of taxes imposed under permanent rate limits in the urban renewal area.” <br />Together, School District 4J and the City impose at least 75% of the amount of taxes imposed under <br />permanent rate limits in the urban renewal area. On May 19, 2010, the School Board for District 4J <br />adopted a motion, for purposes of that statute, concurring with the increase in maximum indebtedness. <br />Therefore, the new legislative limitations are not applicable to the proposed maximum indebtedness <br />increase. <br />Changes to the Downtown Urban Renewal Plan Amendment <br />The draft plan amendment was prepared in February and provided to council prior to work sessions on <br />March 8 and May 10 as well as the April 19 public hearing. As a result of council discussions, <br />conversations with bond counsel, and information from PeaceHealth since that time, the following <br />changes are included in the proposed Plan that is in Attachment A. (The Plan with tracked changes is <br />Attachment F.) <br />