Laserfiche WebLink
These three projects also support the Plan goal to strengthen the economic conditions of the <br />Plan Area. One measure of this goal is the expected increase in the taxable property values <br />caused by the projects. Areas adjacent to the Plan Area are also expected to become more <br />viable. From FY2010/2011 through the estimated remaining life of the District (FY2017/2018), <br />property values in the Plan Area are estimated to increase by about $38 million. The projects <br />will also contribute to the goal of enhancing downtown's role as the regional economic, <br />governmental, and cultural center and central location for public and private development and <br />investment. <br />The 2010 Amendment projects are not expected to have a significant impact on the Eugene 4j <br />School District. The zoning criteria of C2 and C3 do not encourage residential housing. <br />However, the LCC new downtown campus project on the 10 & Charnelton Development Site <br />may include housing. Most likely the housing would be for college -aged students or adults. <br />Past experience also shows residential complexes developed around the Plan Area have <br />focused on adult housing. Based on LCC's preliminary plans and the prior experience, the new <br />downtown campus should have no or minimal impact on the Eugene 4j School District. The <br />added adult population created by this housing project may impact LCC, particularly the <br />downtown campus, and the University of Oregon with increased registration. The other pro- <br />jects in the Plan are not expected to have any significant impact on the Eugene 4j School <br />District. <br />All three of the projects, like all development projects, are expected to impact police services, <br />transportation, utilities, and other public services. Projects within the Plan Area were chosen <br />for the way in which they support recent City Council strategies for downtown and planning <br />efforts for the downtown area, such as the Downtown Plan. These planning documents were <br />based on assumptions about the expected need for new and improved services due to <br />population growth and other factors. The Plan is expected to facilitate improvements within <br />the district, thereby implementing the goals of the planning documents. Therefore, the <br />projects under the Plan do not result in an intensification of development beyond that <br />previously anticipated under the planning documents. <br />The 2010 Amendment follows the passage of Ballot Measure 50 and its implementation rules. <br />In the Measure 50 environment, taxing bodies "forego" revenue produced by the growth in <br />values over a Plan Area's frozen base. The Agency will use tax increment revenues to carry out <br />the Plan. The use of tax increment revenues will affect the property tax revenues and bonded <br />debt tax rates of other taxing jurisdictions that share assessed value with the Plan Area. The <br />property tax impacts are described in Chapter 9. <br />Report on the 2010 Amendment 5 <br />