Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Ms. Harding indicated that there were four recommendations in the first round, although the two related to <br />parking had been grouped together. The recommendations were: <br /> <br />1. R-3/R-4 Parking Strategies and parking for Subsidized Housing <br />a. Near the University of Oregon: <br />i. Require more off-street parking for apartments with three or more bedrooms <br />ii. Allow tandem parking to count toward the minimum off-street parking <br />requirements <br />iii. Amend the West University Refinement Plan (Policy 3A) regarding parking for <br />consistency with the new code <br />b. City-wide: <br />i. Require less parking for low-income, senior and disabled housing developments <br />ii. Clarify the City’s requirements for off-site parking leases <br />iii. Adjust dimensional standards for parking spaces along alleys to allow for more <br />backup space <br /> <br />Ms. Harding said the Planning Commission was generally supportive of the package of parking amendments <br />and encouraged the City to blaze a path for creative solutions like car-sharing and tandem parking. She said <br />the commission asked staff to develop code language for car-sharing as that was not currently in the <br />ordinance. The language would allow, for each 15 spaces required, a credit of three spaces for each shared <br />car, up to three credits per development. <br /> <br />Ms. Harding reviewed the recommendations related to building height limitations. She said the proposal <br />was to reduce allowable building height in the R-3 zone from 50 to 35 feet, and in the R-4 zone from 120 <br />feet to 35, 50, 75, or 90 feet, depending on location and size of the development site. She used drawings to <br />illustrate implementation of the proposed building heights and compare them to the MiCAP (Minor Code <br />Amendments) regulations they would replace. She said while the building heights represented compromise, <br />there was still some opposition to the 90-foot height without additional design standards. <br /> <br />Ms. Harding used an aerial photograph to illustrate the R-2 zoned areas within the Jefferson-Westside <br />neighborhood that would be subject to proposed standards related to dwellings per lot, sloped setbacks, <br />building height, roof form, parking and open space. She said the proposal would allow dwellings per lot <br />within the medium density range of the Metro Plan, from 10.3 to 15 per acre, and the sloped setback concept <br />would establish a compatible building envelope for all new construction. Next steps included a public <br />hearing before the council on November 16, with action scheduled for December 14. <br /> <br />Ms. Piercy asked if there had been any discussion of providing rent discounts to students who did not use a <br />vehicle. She noted that some individuals had expressed an interest in developing a ride-share program in the <br />community. Ms. Harding said that question had not been raised. She said there was a shared car <br />th <br />arrangement among three developments on 19 Avenue and membership by residents was voluntary. <br /> <br />Mr. Clark thanked members of the task team for their work. He asked if the number of housing units lost by <br />reducing the maximum building height from 120 to 90 feet within the designated zones had been calculated. <br />Ms. Harding said that had not been calculated, but information gathered by volunteers in the neighborhood <br />showed that maximum density could be achieved within the lower height. She said the discussion had <br />focused on reducing excess capacity. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council November 9, 2009 Page 3 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />