My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 4 - PH/Ord. on Alarms
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2004
>
CCAgenda-07/12/04Mtg
>
Item 4 - PH/Ord. on Alarms
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:10:07 PM
Creation date
7/8/2004 10:53:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
7/12/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Eugene - Three-year comparison of alarm verification vs. no verification <br /> <br /> Dispatch decrease. A significant reduction in <br /> 3-Year Comparison of dispatched alarm calls has been achieved in the <br /> Alarm Dispatches first year of the verified response protocol. The <br /> graph below demonstrates the dramatic decline in <br /> 6000 police response to intrusion alarms. It is <br /> 5000 important to note that none of the numbers <br /> referenced in this report include robbery, panic, <br /> 4000 hold-up, or duress alarm activations, as police <br /> 3000 continue to respond to these without requiring <br /> verified response. <br /> 2000 <br /> <br /> 1coo During the first period, police responded to 5,464 <br /> 0 intrusion alarms, and the second period resulted <br /> 11/15/00- 11/15/01- 11/15/02- in 5,287 alarm responses. In contrast, in the first <br /> <br /> 11/14/01 11/14/02 11/14/03 (VR) complete year requiring verified response, police <br /> responded to only 396 intrusion alarms. <br /> <br />Alarms associated with a crime incident. The generation of a police report indicates that <br />there is some evidence a crime has taken place, <br />although in many cases the crime is unrelated to the 3-Year Comparison of Alarms <br />alarm activation (e.g. narcotics possession or driving Resulting in a Police Report <br />3.5 <br />under the influence). During the period ending in [= 3 <br />2001, only 1.5% of the 5,464 alarm responses (82) <br />resulted in a police report being taken; of the 5,287 ~, 2.5 <br />intrusion alarms that police responded to during the { 4.5 <br />period ending in 2002, 1.7% (88) generated a report. <br />1 <br />With the implementation of verified response, this {' o.5 <br />rate doubled: police reports were taken in 3% (11) of ~. o <br />the 396 alarms that police responded to during the <br />period ending in 2003. ~v~4/o~ 11/14/o2 11/14/03(VR) <br /> <br />Response times. A review of response times over the three years being considered illustrates <br />the effect of the reduction in priority of intrusion alarms. During the 12-month period ending in <br /> November 2001, prior to reducing the police response <br /> 3-Year Comparison of priority to all intrusion alarms, the average response time <br /> Alarm Response Times from when the intrusion alarm call was dispatched to when <br /> officers arrived on scene was 4.88 minutes. In mid-2002, <br /> those same calls were assigned a reduced dispatch <br /> priority*, thereby increasing the average response time by a <br /> police officer to 4.96 minutes in the period ending in <br /> November 2002. In the first year of the verified response <br /> protocol, intrusion alarm calls received an appropriate <br /> priority recognizing that the alarm had already been verified <br /> and there was a likelihood that criminal activity had <br /> occurred. This is evidenced in the reduction of the average <br /> 11/15/oo- 11/15/Ol- 11/15/o2-police response time to a verified intrusion alarm to 3.45 <br /> 11/14/01 11/14/02 11/14/03 (VR) <br /> minutes. <br /> <br /> Page 2 of 2 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.