Laserfiche WebLink
Financial and/or Resource Considerations <br />Financial resources for the Santa Clara Community Park and related land use processes include the 1998 <br />Parks and Open Space bond measure for land acquisition and Parks System Development Charge (SDC) <br />funding for park development. <br /> <br />Other Background Information <br />The following is an overview of issues that address many of the questions raised by the council <br />regarding the current land swap proposal and the potential alternative action of eminent domain. <br />Attachment A provides specific responses to questions submitted by individual Councilors. <br /> <br />Eminent Domain Alternative <br />The economic value of this deal is highly subjective and subject to what zoning and highest and best use <br />would be considered reasonable. An economic analysis of the proposal was prepared by <br />ECONorthwest, and provided in the report entitled A Community Park for Santa Clara: A Report to the <br />City of Eugene Parks and Open Space Division from the Santa Clara Community Park Advisory <br />Committee. If the council decides to pursue an eminent domain process, the final price per acre will be <br />determined in a courtroom by attorneys and appraisers. The City's real estate staff state that an eminent <br />domain process could result in a cost per acre between $10,000 and $100,000 plus legal costs, with a <br />concern that a jury's determination of value may be more towards the higher "inside the UGB" value. <br />The current proposal not only obtains Santa Clara parkland, but also results in the City obtaining fee title <br />or conservation and public access easements--a total of 207 acres for $950,000, or $4,590/acre. <br /> <br />In viewing the issue of land valuation, there are two fundamental questions to consider. Will this <br />particular property be included in the UGB at sometime in the future? And, if it is, is there a benefit in <br />making this decision now and not later? There are three significant benefits to evaluate. One, a <br />community park to serve Santa Clara is obtained. Two, protection for the natural resource values of the <br />Laurel Hill Valley site is ensured, and significant Ridgeline Trail connections are provided. And finally, <br />as a part owner of the property, the City will have an unprecedented opportunity to determine how a <br />property is developed. Unique public/private partnerships may be developed to ensure there are <br />adequate parks, pedestrian and bike paths, and connected residential and commercial neighborhoods that <br />follow the principles of smart growth and provide an exemplary prototype for supporting nodal <br />development efforts. <br /> <br />Site Selection <br />The Irvington/McDougal site was selected as the preferred site for a community park by Parks Planning <br />staff before the land swap proposal was received from the property owner. The site selection process <br />was reviewed with the council at the November 2003 work session (Attachment B). Criteria used <br />included size of property, relation to the Santa Clara service area, level of site improvements, site <br />configuration, suitability for park development, presence of flood hazard areas, access, and relationship <br />to the UGB. The selection process was done with a 40-acre park minimum as a basis. The 77-acre <br />number was the counter offer from the property owners, and is the result of a desire to balance the 120 <br />acres coming into the UGB for residential development in Santa Clara with the 120 acres coming out of <br />the UGB in Laurel Hill. While 77 acres was not originally sought, it is certainly preferable. A larger <br />site, comparable to Amazon Park, will accommodate the programming needs identified to-date <br />(Attachment C), addresses future demands, and allows for the ability to provide desired natural open <br />space in addition to active recreation facilities. <br /> <br /> L:\CMO\2004 Council Agendas\M040712\S0407125.DOC <br /> <br /> <br />