Laserfiche WebLink
There was a desire to provide a visual connection from the Fairmount neighborhood to the south <br />to riparian areas along the Millrace and Willamette River. Studies indicated that the proposed <br />building heights will not impact existing views from areas of the neighborhood like Judkins point, <br />which has the best visual access to the river. <br />Building stepbacks above the third and fifth story help protect views to the river along the public <br />rights of way to the extent that scenic views of the tree canopy along the river can be preserved <br />along street corridors. These building stepbacks along these streets also would reduce the risk of <br />creating a tall looming wall, humanize the scale of the street, particularly for pedestrians, and al- <br />low for more sunlight on the street and sidewalk. <br />As properties are developed <br />and redeveloped in the fu- <br />ture,, it is likely that there will <br />be opportunities for pocket <br />parks and other small public <br />open space amenities. These <br />types of spaces are an attri- <br />bute for urban areas and can <br />provide recreation space for <br />neighborhood residents. Such <br />amenities can be incorporated <br />into public improvements, or <br />created in association with pri- <br />vate development. The code <br />provides incentives, such as <br />exceeding the maximum set- <br />back requirement, for privately <br />developed public open spaces. <br />Review processes and alternative Path <br />The form based code provides clear and objective standards that can be reviewed under the build- <br />ing permit.process only. There is also an alternative path for development applications that may <br />not meet the form based criteria, but would still be consistent with the intent and vision for the <br />area. Because the form based code is based on the community's vision and because the impor- <br />tant policies and design criteria have been codified in the form based code and other applicable <br />code sections there is less need to rely on the policies in the Walnut Station Specific Area Plan itself <br />to address neighborhood and compatibility concerns. Policies are not applied to a development <br />application unless that development requires a land use application. Recommendations resulting <br />from this planning process have also codified where they pertain to site design issues and building <br />form standards, and public street requirements. <br />As part of the Walnut Station Special Area Zone, and as recommended by stakeholders, the walnut <br />Station code provisions include an alternative review path called Design Review. This path allows <br />development applications that meet the intent of the code, but that do not meet all of the clear <br />and object standards, an alternative means by which the application is reviewed against discre- <br />tionary design review approval criteria. These criteria are based on the goals and objectives for <br />the area, including relevant policies from the Fairmount /University of Oregon Special Area Study. <br />Addressing impacts <br />Form based codes place a greater emphasis on the physical character of development and <br />deemphasize the regulation of land use. The design standards that are applied through the <br />form based code do however regulate uses in the area to a certain degree. For example, the <br />22 <br />