Laserfiche WebLink
“With the increase in mandatory fines, the courts need to be more sensitive to the financial needs of this <br />community--people are broke--we should look at Portland’s community court model to save $ for lesser <br />offenses. We need a municipal shelter instead of religious ones to provide basic needs to poor people so <br />they don't have to steal or trespass to get by. Need more community service type activities in lieu of <br />fines; perhaps like Josephine County where hours are converted to dollars?” <br />DISCUSSION WITH JUDGE ALLEN <br />On July 13, 2010 the committee met with Judge Allen to discuss the survey results with him. He shared <br />with us his goals as presiding judge, his assessment of changes over the past four years to address areas of <br />improvements in the court, and his reaction to the survey data and comments. Below is a summary of <br />some of those achievements: <br />Areas of Improvement Since 2006 <br />In 2008 the Eugene City Council adopted Ordinance 20419 which defined a downtown public safety zone <br />(DPSZ) and enacted conditions under which the Eugene Municipal Court could exclude a person from <br />this zone. Municipal Court has administered the new ordinance carefully and effectively. It has proven to <br />be a useful sanction for chronic offenders in the downtown public safety zone and beneficial in supporting <br />the Council’s recent focus on downtown safety. <br />During the summer of 2009, Municipal Court offered an “Amnesty” discount to all individuals with <br />accounts that had been referred to the city’s collection agency. The program was highly effective and <br />helped people pay off their outstanding debt and in many cases allowed them to reinstate their driver’s <br />license. The program was developed in response to the economic downturn and the large number of <br />defendants the court observed who failed to pay their fines. The program resulted in over 300 individuals <br />reinstating their license and generated approximately $130,000 in revenue to the city. <br />Municipal Court has made significant strides with technology over the past four years. In 2008, the court <br />implemented a document imaging (scanning) system for all closed case files. Now staff, judges and <br />attorneys can quickly access closed case files electronically. Police reports are now available <br />electronically and are accessed by judges in the courtroom using tablet PCs. Beginning in 2011 court will <br />transition to the new AIRS case management system which will further automate court processes. There <br />are also plans to develop an entirely paperless process for the court, where information will be received <br />electronically, adjudicated using workflow and ultimately archived in an electronic database. The <br />committee was impressed with Municipal Court’s technologically achievements in relation to other <br />courts. <br />Significant Issues Since 2006 <br />Along with the rest of the city organization, Municipal Court has had to make significant reductions to <br />help balance the budget over the last several years. Many changes have occurred, including major <br />reductions to staffing levels. While the court has managed well during these difficult fiscal years, it will <br />be challenging to absorb additional work at current capacity if case load increases substantially. <br />