My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item A: Judicial Report
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2010
>
CC Agenda - 07/28/10 Work Session
>
Item A: Judicial Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2010 1:37:00 PM
Creation date
7/23/2010 1:12:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
7/28/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Key Issues for the Court <br />Now that the City has procured the new police facility on Country Club Road it will be vital to find a <br />sustainable location for the court. City Hall does not sufficiently handle the court’s capacity. Additional <br />courtrooms, a larger jury room and space for attorneys and judges to meet are necessary. <br />Lack of jail bed space continues to be a major concern for the court. As the County systems have failed, <br />the City has chosen to rely more heavily on Municipal Court to maintain safety in the community. The <br />court has absorbed more cases from the District Attorney and maintained an active role in resolving high <br />priority crime issues. Lack of adequate consequences for these types of cases presents a serious challenge <br />to the community's perception of safety, especially in the downtown area. To support the downtown <br />safety efforts and the effectiveness of the court, it is imperative that Municipal Court has adequate jail bed <br />space. Utilizing the Springfield Jail for sentenced offenders at a less expensive rate may be viable <br />alternative which should be explored. <br />Response to 2010 Survey <br />Judge Allen spoke to the committee about the survey and a few of the comments that concerned him. He <br />acknowledged the need to evaluate the associate judges and work with them closely on policy issues and <br />information presented to defendants in the courtroom. He also made reference to a new judge that will be <br />starting in the near future. He felt the change would be positive for the court and bring a new perspective <br />on the operation. <br />Judge Allen also addressed the concerns about financial sanctions imposed by the court. He pointed out <br />that Eugene Municipal Court has one of the lowest base fine schedules in the state and that he pays very <br />close attention to defendant’s ability to pay their sanctions. Judge Allen explained that defendants who <br />face financial challenges often choose to work off their fines by performing community service or work <br />on the Lane County Work Crew. He felt that many of the negative comments received we’re based on a <br />misunderstanding of his intent but acknowledged better communication needs to occur with attorneys and <br />police. <br />Where is Municipal Court Heading? <br />The next four years will be challenging with the City’s budget shortfall still a significant concern. <br />Potential reductions at the State and County level may also further impact the court’s ability to use <br />alternative services and programs. Technology improvements should help mitigate some of the budget <br />issues and allow the court to operate more efficiently at its current staffing levels and continue to provide <br />service to the community at a high level. The court and Judge Allen consistently receive high ratings on <br />their performance because of the size, resources and collaborative nature of this court to be innovative and <br />responsive to community concerns. Municipal Court continues to play a key role in quality of life issues <br />and safety in the downtown area. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.