Laserfiche WebLink
Councilor Poling wished to point out that the bill did not sp to the expansion of . a ' • <br />P p UGB, �t only provided cities <br />an additional tool in the event that an expansion of the UGB was necessary. He averred ' <br />�'Y that the no- interest loan <br />could be a viab tool for any community. <br />Councilor Clark understood that it would be accurate to say hat some cities were under r a requirement, due to <br />growth, to expand a UGB. He said when a city had to expand the UGB and had to rovide <br />p the infrastructure to do <br />so, the bill would provide a mechanism to pay for it out of a loan from state funds rather <br />than having to cut local <br />programs in order to afford the requirement. Ms. Wilson responded'that this was "one way o look at ' " <br />Y �t. <br />Councilor ,Taylor asked what the interest rate on the loans would be. Ms. Wilson replied ied that the interest rate was <br />zero: Councilor Taylor asked where the money would go if it did not o into the loans. Ms. <br />g Wilson responded that <br />the bonds had not been sold yet; the bill would authorize the state to sell the bonds. • <br />She noted that, theoretically, <br />the state had a finite amount of bonds that it could sell. <br />Councilor Taylor commented that this was a far lower interest rate than what ea le <br />p p paying street assessments <br />were charged by the City. <br />Councilor Zelenka was worried about unintended consequences. Ms. Wilson replied ' <br />p that �t would provide <br />communities who wished to expand their UGBs, or Who were forced to do so additional resources. She thought it <br />could provide an incentive for those communities that were thinking bout expanding g p g their UGBs, but did not have <br />the financial resources to develop the infrastructure at the beginning of the expansion. <br />g g p on. <br />Roll call vote; the motion passed, 5:3; councilors Brown, Taylor, and Zelenka voting opposition. <br />Y gin opposlt�on. <br />Councilor Zelenka, seconded by Councilor Clark, moved to ratify he Inter overnmen ' <br />fY g tai Commit- <br />tee's unanimous actions on bills and approval of staff recommendations in the April 29 and <br />�, 2009 Inter overnmental Re P � May <br />, <br />g Relations Bill Reports for bills not pulled for discussion at those Inter- <br />governmental Relations Committee meetings. Roll call vote; the motion assed unanimousl y, s.a. <br />4. ACTION: <br />Appointment to Civilian Review Board <br />Councilor Zelenka, seconded by Councilor Clark, moved to appoint Tim Laue top Position 4 on the <br />pP osi <br />Civilian Review Board, the unexpired term of John Norton Cabell for a term ending 3 1, 2009. <br />. � on October <br />Councilor Taylor, seconded by Councilor Brown, moved to substitute Marisa Men - <br />Mendoza for Posy <br />tion 4. Roll call vote; the motion failed, 6:2; councilors Brown and Taylor voting g in favor. <br />Roll call vote; the main motion passed, 7: l ; Councilor Taylor votin g PP in opposition. <br />5. ACTION: <br />Ratification of the Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission FY10 Regional Wastewater <br />Program Budget and Capital Improvements Program <br />Councilor Zelenka, seconded by Councilor Clark, moved to ratify FYI Metropolitan politan Waste - <br />water Management Commission Budget. <br />Councilor Brown asked how the departure of Hynix Semiconductor Inc, had impacted ' <br />} p d the Metropolitan Wastewa- <br />ter Management Commission (MSMC). Lori Davis, Business Manager for the Wastewater ' <br />g ter D�visxon, explained <br />that Hynix had been the largest industrial user and its departure had caused a large P g drop in revenue. <br />MINUTES —Eugene City Council May l l 2009 <br />Regular Meeting <br />Y � Page 5 <br />