Laserfiche WebLink
reflective of the community’s values. They spoke to the importance the organization placed on its <br />employees and its commitment to providing the community with services even in difficult economic times. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy expressed appreciation for the Manager’s efforts on behalf of downtown, the arts, and culture. <br />She appreciated that the Manager did not get defensive when criticized or when the council made <br />suggestions. The Manager did not appear to mind taking the heat for his decisions. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy thought there was more work to do. She wanted the Manager to strengthen his relationships <br />with labor. She also called for continued work on public safety and youth issues. Mayor Piercy advocated <br />for more work on the City’s relationship with the County and hoped that the two organizations could be <br />better partners. Mayor Piercy said she generally found the Manager good to work with. <br /> <br />Mr. Clark agreed with much of what Mayor Piercy said. He thought the Manager did an outstanding job <br />leading the organization over the past year. He said there were frequent opportunities for contentious <br />situations to arise, and he appreciated that the Manager kept the council and community focused on a “best <br />outcomes” point of view. He thought that helped the council to move forward positively. He hoped the <br />Manager could maintain that positive attitude while modeling a service mentality for the organization. He <br />recalled the Manager saying during his interview that he saw himself as a coach with the goal of creating a <br />high-functioning team and Mr. Clark thought that had been accomplished. He thought many of the <br />Manager’s hires had been “just right” and helped create a supportive organization. <br /> <br />Mr. Clark believed the fact that few amendments had been proposed to the last budget was a testament to <br />the Manager’s excellent preparation. <br /> <br />Mr. Clark indicated acceptance of the Manager’s compensation recommendations. He commended the <br />concept of compensation packages tied to specific performance measures that took the politics out of the <br />process. He did not think a subcommittee was needed. <br /> <br />Mr. Zelenka also thanked the Manager and commended the job he had done over the past year, particularly <br />in regard to the budget. He thought the principles used in the preparation of the budget were well thought- <br />out. Mr. Zelenka liked the links the Manager had created between the council’s goals and policies and the <br />work plan as he had long thought that such linkages were necessary. <br /> <br />Mr. Zelenka said he frequently heard from residents that the Manager was doing a good job and he <br />appreciated the Manager’s outreach to the community and thought he had built up community trust. He <br />thought that the Manager had made some great hires at the executive team level and particularly commended <br />the hiring of Assistant Manager Medary, Central Services Director Kristi Hammitt, and Police Chief Pete <br />Kerns. Mr. Zelenka commended the Manager for employing the triple bottom line tool and hoped that <br />further work was done with the tool. <br /> <br />Mr. Zelenka expressed particular appreciation for the Manager’s communication with the council. <br /> <br />Mr. Zelenka recommended that the Manager work on his relationship with the City’s unions and the <br />University of Oregon. He appreciated the economic development plan but did not think it adequately <br />captured the shift to the “green economy” and hoped more work was done on that. <br /> <br />Mr. Zelenka also indicated acceptance of the Manager’s compensation recommendations. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council July 26, 2010 Page 5 <br /> Work Session <br />