My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 3A: Approval of City Council Minutes
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2010
>
CC Agenda - 09/08/10 Work Session
>
Item 3A: Approval of City Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2010 11:25:01 AM
Creation date
9/1/2010 3:47:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
9/8/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
them out. He appreciated Mr. Michaels’ comments and agreed that they needed to do the work and do it <br />well, but they needed to make sure they did not do it badly or in a hurry. He noted that San José had <br />experienced many problems with its oversight system and recently fired its auditor. He was glad the <br />community was going to “do this well.” <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka said he fully supported a strong auditor and had supported the ballot measure. He <br />sympathized with most of the concerns expressed by people and he supported most of Councilor Bettman’s <br />amendments. He observed that some of the people who had testified seemed to be under the impression that <br />the council had to do something in order to implement what the voters had passed. He stressed that this was <br />not so; the office of the Police Auditor was required and was not discretionary. He stated that the voters had <br />not been asked whether all of Councilor Bettman’s amendments and changes should be implemented. He <br />had come to understand that Eugene was very engaged and people expected to have a say. He supported the <br />committee, noting that he would serve on it, and believed it to be balanced. He related that he intended to <br />make sure all of the issues were fully vetted. He also stressed that the deadline for the process to be <br />completed was March 11. He disagreed with people who felt they should “just get it over with quickly.” He <br />did not think doing so would resolve the issues in the community and could make things worse. He pointed <br />out that the Police Auditor supported the committee approach. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka encouraged Mr. Clemens to attend the Sustainability Commission meeting, scheduled for <br />the third Wednesday in December at 5:30 p.m. in the library. He said they were working on a second set of <br />recommendations, one of which was a community food security plan. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman reiterated her objections to the committee process for her proposed changes. She called <br />not moving forward with them “going back to square one.” She asserted that other charter amendments did <br />not take this kind of time. She declared the process to be a “diversion.” She called the Eugene auditor a <br />“weak” position. She said the reason she had not included subpoena provisions in her proposed amendments <br />was because that would be a change from the authorities that had been decided upon. She asserted that the <br />fact that her amendments were being characterized as changes was wrong. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor agreed with Ms. Berg-Caldwell’s assertion that Councilor Bettman’s amendments were <br />just “codifying what was passed.” She was surprised that the attorneys had not brought forward this <br />language “instead of waiting for a councilor to do it.” She asserted that the amendments did not change <br />anything and were not far-reaching and “radical.” She called the amendments routine and believed that <br />having a committee process was a “diversion.” <br /> <br />Councilor Ortiz asked City Manager Jon Ruiz for guidance as to how to discuss the library security incident <br />that had been related to them. She had heard anecdotal stories similar to the one that Mr. Cantrelle shared. <br />Mr. Ruiz responded that they should talk and get a better feel for the concerns that had been expressed. <br /> <br />Councilor Ortiz also wished to address people who said they had lost faith in the EPD. She had not lost <br />faith in the department and this was why she kept working on it. She said they were part of the City and <br />were City employees just like the people who work in the parks and recreation divisions. She declared that <br />they were part of the community, too. She wanted to have good working conditions for them and she wanted <br />to believe that they were trying to do what they thought was the best they could do. She averred that the <br />community needed to let them know what was expected of them. She did not want to give up on the fact that <br />the community needed a good police department. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman asserted that the community did not have accountability in the police department and <br />when they had accountability the community’s trust would be restored. She recounted the events <br />surrounding the tasering incident of May 30. She believed that the issue was not being “played out” where <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council November 24, 2008 Page 7 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.