Laserfiche WebLink
thth <br />Ms. Piercy expressed that the 150 Oregon birthday celebration might be a good opportunity to incorporate the 40 <br />anniversary efforts for the Oregon Country Fair and Saturday Market. <br />Ms. Taylor noted that she had attended a recent workshop concerning high school dropouts and noted efforts by the <br />City of Springfield to encourage minority high school graduates to begin a public service career by guaranteeing <br />college tuition for high school graduates. <br />Ms. Taylor, seconded by Ms. Bettman, moved to direct the City Manager to bring back to <br />the council a resolution supporting the creation of a U.S. Department of Peace and <br />scheduling the resolution for action. <br />Ms. Taylor noted that she had brought her motion before the council in response to suggestions from her constituents. <br />Ms. Piercy commented on a recent packet of information that had been previously distributed to the council regarding <br />the U.S. Department of Peace initiative referenced by Ms. Taylor. <br />Mr. Pryor expressed that while he had no qualms with the content or spirit of the motion or the objectives a federal <br />entity devoted to peace concerns might have, he felt that the motion had been brought before the council in a <br />precipitous and hurried manner that would prevent thoughtful discussion of the issue. He subsequently indicated that <br />he would reluctantly not support Ms. Taylor’s motion. <br />Mr. Poling agreed with Mr. Pryor and felt that the department of peace suggested by the motion was an example of <br />unnecessary and inefficient duplication of government resources. He also felt any such federal department would not <br />have much practical effect on local issues regarding peace initiatives. <br />Ms. Bettman felt the procedural concerns raised by Mr. Pryor regarding the motion represented an attempt to <br />obfuscate the process by which community members could bring issues to their city council. <br />Ms. Solomon felt that it was unnecessary to bring a federal issue such as that referenced in Ms. Taylor’s motion <br />before the council. <br />Mr. Clarke agreed with Ms. Solomon’s comment and said any practical concerns that might be addressed by a <br />federal department devoted to peace and justice were in fact already designed to be addressed by the United States <br />Justice Department and other established federal agencies. <br />Mr. Zelenka felt that the motion needed further discussion and noted his support of it. <br />Ms. Piercy suggested that the council adopt a more stringent policy regarding the submission of motions before the <br />council if there were concerns that current procedures were inefficient or harmful to the interests of the public. <br />Ms. Piercy expressed that local city governments had a strong role to play in the creation of effective federal policies. <br />Ms. Piercy called for a vote on Ms. Taylor’s previously stated motion. The motion passed <br />5:4, Mr. Pryor, Mr. Clark, Ms. Solomon, and Mr. Poling voting in opposition. <br /> <br />B. WORK SESSION: <br /> <br />Legislative Policies Document <br />Intergovernmental Relations Manager Brenda Wilson presented a brief overview of the process whereby the City <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council November 24, 2008 Page 3 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />