My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 3A: Approval of City Council Minutes
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2010
>
CC Agenda - 09/08/10 Work Session
>
Item 3A: Approval of City Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2010 11:25:01 AM
Creation date
9/1/2010 3:47:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
9/8/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Zelenka, seconded by Ms. Taylor, moved to delete the item stating “Eugene supports the <br />‘Big Look’ review,” from the Land Use Planning and Growth Management subsection of the <br />legislative policies document. <br />Ms. Bettman, seconded by Ms. Taylor, moved to substitute by revising the aforementioned <br />item regarding the Big Look review to state, “Eugene supports a Big Look review outcome <br />that preserves farm and forest land and natural resources, preserves the integrity of the <br />urban growth boundaries, supports compact urban growth, and supports Oregon’s land use <br />laws.” <br />Ms. Wilson, responding to a question from Mr. Clark, noted that the Big Look review was nearly complete and that <br />the findings resulting from that review would be presented to the council in due course. <br />Mr. Clark believed the legislative policy objective under discussion only supported the Big Look review being <br />conducted, and not blanket support of the findings contained in the review. He noted he would not support the <br />substitute motion. <br />Ms. Piercy called for a vote on Ms. Bettman’s previously stated substitute motion. The <br />motion failed 3:5, Mr. Clark, Mr. Pryor, Mr. Poling, Ms. Solomon and Ms. Ortiz voting in <br />opposition. <br />Ms. Piercy called for a vote on Mr. Zelenka’s previously stated motion. The motion passed <br />unanimously, 8:0. <br />Ms. Wilson recommended that the council remove the objective item referencing the Goal 5 protections from <br />Measure 37/49 claims. <br />Mr. Clark, seconded by Ms. Solomon moved to delete the items stating “Eugene supports <br />the constitutional requirement that property owners who have been deprived of all <br />reasonable economic use of their property by government action be compensated,” and <br />“Eugene opposes a requirement that compensation be paid if a land use decision deprives a <br />property owner of only some, but not all or nearly all, reasonable economic use of the <br />property,” from the Land Use Planning and Growth Management subsection of the <br />legislative policies document. <br />Mr. Clark noted that he disagreed with the intent of the objectives in question and felt that they were unduly <br />burdensome in requiring all reasonable economic use to be deprived rather than a portion or portions of same. <br />Ms. Piercy called for a vote on Mr. Clark’s previously stated motion. The motion failed 5:3, <br />Ms. Bettman, Ms. Ortiz, Ms. Taylor, Mr. Pryor and Mr. Zelenka voting in opposition. <br />V. Planning and Community Services—D. Land Use Planning and Growth Management--D2. Land Use <br />Application Review Process <br /> <br />Assistant City Attorney Emily Jerome, responding to a question from Ms. Bettman, noted that the objective item <br />referencing adopted plan policies to be incorporated by reference into the Land Use Code had been created in <br />response to previous legislative policies that had required adopted Metro Plan policies to be reprinted in the code in <br />their entirety. <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council November 24, 2008 Page 7 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.