My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2A - Approval of Minutes
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2004
>
CCAgenda-07/26/04Mtg
>
Item 2A - Approval of Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:23:16 PM
Creation date
7/21/2004 9:06:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
7/26/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Dwyer observed that the various plans were intended to provide a framework for urban <br />and rural development. He commented that a regional wastewater facility necessary to address new <br />regulatory standards was intended to serve new and existing industrial and commercial uses. He said that <br />2,000 people worked in Coburg and lived throughout Lane County and he encouraged the jurisdictions to <br />find a way to extend service to Coburg if it was determined to be feasible and logical to do so. He said <br />that State funding was available to study the issue, but in order to access it there had to be some indication <br />from jurisdictions that they were willing to proceed if the results of an evaluation were positive. He <br />encouraged inclusion of a statement of intent in the PSFP. Ms. Smith replied that feedback from all three <br />jurisdictions indicated an interest in studying the issue more closely to determine what was feasible. <br /> <br />Commissioner Dwyer said that Coburg was at a crucial point and the Department of Environmental <br />Quality had just declared the area north of Coburg through Linn County a groundwater-sensitive area <br />because of nitrates and other factors. He said it was important to let Coburg know if the jurisdictions <br />were willing to be partners. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman asked if the findings included with the ordinances distributed to the Eugene City <br />Council were identical to the findings provided to the other two bodies. Mr. Mott replied that they were <br />the same. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman said her understanding was that Coburg wished to conduct an initial study of the <br />issues and was interested in support from the other jurisdictions that they were willing to evaluate the <br />feasibility; Coburg was not requesting a plan amendment. She expressed her concern about the financial <br />implications because Coburg did not have SDCs (system development charges), which was what <br />encouraged businesses to locate there. She said that unless there were federal or state funds available to <br />assist Coburg to replace the capacity that it was in deficit of, she could not understand how service could <br />be extended without the other jurisdictions subsidizing that infrastructure. <br /> <br />Councilor Ballew echoed Councilor Bettman's remarks and emphasized that the impacts to Eugene and <br />Springfield need to be clearly understood before a commitment to extend service to Coburg was made. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey suggested that it would be helpful if the City of Coburg would put in writing those issues to <br />which they wanted responses from the jurisdictions. <br /> <br />Councilor Fitch commented that Springfield directed its executive to begin framing the evaluation process <br />and asked if Lane County and Eugene were providing the same direction to their staff. <br /> <br />Commissioner Dwyer and Mayor Torrey indicated that the Lane County and Eugene executives had been <br />asked to develop information on the issues to be addressed and resources required. <br /> <br />The meeting adjourned at 6:50 p.m. <br /> <br />(Recorded by Lynn Taylor) <br />m: 12004~j'ointlelected officials~j'eoO40622ws, doc <br /> <br />MINUTES--Joint Elected Officials - Work Session June 22, 2004 Page 3 <br /> Lane County, Eugene, and Springfield <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.