Laserfiche WebLink
· Social Security Numbers <br />As a result of a work session on current police practices for requesting and using social security <br />numbers as a form of identification, a joint Police and Human Rights Commission task force was <br />formed to address the community sensitivities regarding this practice while meeting the needs of <br />officers to verify people's identities during contacts. The Social Security Number (SSN) Task Force <br />agreed to the following three objectives: <br /> <br /> · To develop a policy that clearly delineates the circumstances in which social security <br /> numbers would be requested to improve consistency in police practices; <br /> <br /> · To develop and implement officer training on both the new policy and the community <br /> sensitivities around requesting/collecting social security numbers; <br /> <br /> · To conduct a public education and outreach effort to explain police policies and procedures <br /> so that people are better informed about what to expect during a police contact, particularly <br /> as related to supplying social security numbers. <br /> <br />Committee members worked with staff to create a new policy, General Order 308.39 - Social Security <br />Numbers to describe the situations when requesting SSNs would be appropriate. The policy also <br />establishes that other valid, government issued identification, including the Matricula Consular issued <br />by the Mexican Consulate, was acceptable as secondary identification. Officer training on both the <br />new policy and the Matricula Consular was held in June, and the policy went into effect on July 1, <br />2004. <br /> <br />III. Challenges and Next Steps <br /> <br />a. Workload Management <br /> <br />During the previous work plan, the complex and time-intensive SWAT policy review caused a <br />significant deviation from the adopted work plan. The onset of anti-war demonstrations prompted the <br />Police Commission to take a leadership role as liaisons between the police department and peace <br />protest organizers, which also impacted the work plan. This past year, emerging issues were not as <br />problematic. However, the expansion of work session items or liaison activities into more significant <br />projects did pose a workload management challenge. For example, the work session held on the use of <br />social security numbers resulted in the formation of a task team that met over the next eight months, <br />working with department staff to develop a policy and design a community education proposal. The <br />downtown community policing partnership expanded into a planning project involving a team of over <br />a dozen stakeholders and spanned several months to draft public safety strategies focused on <br />improving the conditions downtown. Lastly, following a work session on the status of locations that <br />were generating a high volume of alcohol-related calls for service, the commission passed a motion to <br />revisit the Special Response Fee ordinance and determine if modifications to improve its effectiveness <br />were possible. Staff workload constraints precluded initiation of this ordinance review during this <br />fiscal year. <br /> <br />These project expansions are by no means extraneous uses of commission time and resources. To the <br />contrary, the SSN policy is one of the first of such policies in the nation and can serve as a model for <br />other communities looking to balance privacy protections and law enforcement needs. The work of the <br /> <br />2004 Annual Report Page 8 of 10 <br /> <br /> <br />