Laserfiche WebLink
1. The appearance of and equipment used by the SWAT Team and their impact on community <br /> relations and trust <br /> 2. The criteria used in making SWAT activation decisions <br /> 3. Procedures for notifying impacted community members during a SWAT incident and providing <br /> follow-up information to the public <br /> 4. Use of force issues, including temporary restraints, "spit hoods" and forcible entry into <br /> residences <br /> 5. Procedures for treatment of nude or partially clothed suspects <br /> 6. Incident debrief and critique <br /> 7. Training and equipment issues <br /> 8. Resource issues related to SWAT response to incidents outside the city of Eugene. <br /> <br />The committee completed its analysis in February 2004. The following revised policies were <br />unanimously accepted by the Police Commission and forwarded to Chief Lehner with a <br />recommendation for adoption on April 8th: <br /> <br /> · General Order 304.4 - Search Warrants <br /> · General Order 801.4 - Hostage/Barricaded Subjects <br /> · General Order 1201.5 - Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) Team <br /> · General Order 1201.7 - Crisis Negotiation Team <br /> <br />It should be noted that the commission remains concerned about the disproportional use of Eugene <br />police resources to respond to SWAT incidents in the County, particularly given the recent budgetary <br />decision by the Sheriff to discontinue participation in Metro SWAT. The commission has requested an <br />annual staff report on the implementation of its policy recommendations and will stay informed on <br />resource issues related to SWAT responses outside of Eugene. <br /> <br />· Drug Detection Dog <br />In the summer of 2003, the department initiated a new drug detection dog program to support the <br />department's enforcement efforts involving possession of significant quantities, as well as the sale and <br />distribution, of illegal drugs. The overarching policy issues the committee discussed involved <br />constitutional and community expectations of privacy, protection from unreasonable search and <br />seizures, and the provision of effective enforcement of drug laws. The resulting policy, General Order <br />1201.8 - Drug Detection Dog Program, addressed these issues by describing the situations that are <br />appropriate for requesting and using the dog, setting forth procedures for training and deployment <br />documentation, and describing supervisor responsibilities. The policy provides protections against <br />unwarranted searches that, in many cases, exceed current case law standards. The Police Commission <br />approved the final policy at its October 9th meeting. <br /> <br />· In-Car Video Cameras <br />The commission planned to help the department develop a new policy for the use of in-car video <br />cameras in anticipation of expanding the use of such devices. Unfortunately, workload issues <br />precluded the commission from initiating this project and it was carried over into the FY05 work plan. <br /> <br />2004 Annual Report Page 7 of 10 <br /> <br /> <br />