Laserfiche WebLink
CE–ICAP* <br />ITY OF UGENE NTERNAL LIMATE CTION LAN <br />Emissions Reductions by Strategy <br />Review of strategies <br />It’s important to look at the plan in terms of not only the timeline, but in terms of the types of strategies <br />which can be employed to reach our goal. The actions in the plan have been categorized into three <br />strategies, each addressing a different facet of emissions reduction. <br />Implement Conservation: <br /> This strategy is based on specific changes in staff practices and procedures <br />without any change in equipment. These types of actions can be accomplished initially with little or no <br />cost and can be implemented relatively quickly. However, these types of actions are limited by existing <br />technology and must be carefully implemented to avoid impact on staff productivity. Savings from <br />these measures tend to decrease over time without centralized support from the organization in the form <br />of policy, follow-up, training and feedback on their effectiveness. These types of strategies, combined <br />with efforts to institutionalize the changes, are an excellent and cost-effective foundation for emissions <br />reduction. <br />Efficient Technology: <br /> Upgrades to high efficiency equipment are the foundation of this plan. <br />Replacement or retrofit of outdated equipment not only provides reliable emissions reduction and energy <br />cost savings, but can improve reliability and comfort, and decrease maintenance cost. This strategy is <br />maximized by combining efficiency improvements with conservation efforts. This can often help <br />reduce the first cost by reducing overall equipment needs. Efficiency upgrades can be limited by <br />availability and cost of equipment or existing conditions (for instance the orientation or structure of a <br />building). They also must be balanced with the cost of maintenance and any issues around the maturity <br />of the technology, since equipment that fails to function as intended will not achieve desired emissions <br />reductions. Although not as dependent as conservation, these types of actions also require some support <br />as there may be different expectations or operating procedures. <br />Renewable Energy: <br /> Renewable energy produces fewer greenhouse gas emissions and has less impact <br />on the environment. This strategy uses alternative energy sources, such as bio-fuels, EWEB Greenpower <br />or solar energy to meet operational needs. This strategy can provide rapid emissions reductions, often <br />without significant initial investment. Connecting the use of renewable energy to conservation and <br />efficiency efforts will amplify their effectiveness. <br />These three strategies present complementary approaches to meeting the challenge of emissions <br />reduction. However, each type of action, and effective climate action in general, also requires <br />comprehensive efforts to shift the culture of the organization. While action promoting culture change <br />serves to support and “cement” the savings of other actions, and may be considered to be a part of those <br />actions. The success of the overall plan will, to some extent, be dependent on the ability of the <br />organization to internalize the concepts in the plan. <br />23 <br /> <br />*Plan adopted as a framework; subject to additional edits. Plan may be modified pending implementation. <br />